October 5, 2020 JV

Nothing to see here

Mind tricks, or mind control, refer to a spectrum

of Force powers which can influence the thoughts

of sentient creatures. Some examples of mind tricks

include persuading a person to do something they

would find unpalatable, creating a sensation of fear,

or causing them to see or hear things that were not

there, including illusions. One sinister variation of

the power is “Force Corruption,” an ability that forces

targets to the user’s side, while slowly draining their

life. It usually works on the weak-minded. The Sith

has attempted mind control in a critical battle of the

What is the origin of SARS-COV2?  The World Health Organization and the world’s medical establishment assures the masses that it jumped from an exotic animal, possibly a bat or a pangolin, to humans via the wet markets in Wuhan, China.  In the Star Wars film, Rogue One, many brave souls risked their lives in an attempt to steal the plans to the Death Star.  I believe that one of the bravest heroes of the current SARS WARS is Dr. Li-Meng Yan.

Dr. Yan is a Chinese virologist who claims to have been aware of person-to-person transmission of COVID-19 in late December 2019 and attempted to communicate the risks to her senior managers in January 2020.  She alleges that the Chinese government and the WHO knew about the person-to-person transmission of COVID-19 earlier than they reported or made public, and suppressed both her research and that of others.  Yan said that she was one of the first scientists in the world to study the outbreak in Wuhan, at the University of Hong Kong (a WHO reference lab), when she was asked to investigate a cluster of SARS-like cases, in December 2019.  Yan has maintained an extensive network of medical professionals from mainland China, one of whom supposedly told Yan about person-to-person transmission of the novel disease on 31 December 2019.  She was told by her superiors “to keep silent and be careful.”  She fled to the United States on 28 April with the intention to deliver “the message of the truth of COVID,” adding that if she tried to tell her story in China, she would be “disappeared and killed.”

Dr. Yan published an initial paper providing evidence of why it is more plausible to believe that SARS-COV-2 was manipulated in late 2019 to become infectious by humans.  She is preparing a follow-up paper to make further claims with the aim of supporting a comprehensive, independent investigation into the origins of SARS-COV2.  The CCP is resisting any such requests (already made by the US, Australian, UK, French and German governments).

I’m sure that it has not escaped your attention that the WHO’s Director-General Tedros Adhanom has been a willing spokesperson for the CCP and therefore, many virologists aligned with the WHO have criticised her work.  I am not a virologist, but can read and understand some basic scientific concepts.  Having read her report, examined her and other relevant evidence and created a time-line of events, I agree with Dr. Yan’s assessment.  There appears to be ample evidence of viral “function-gain” manipulation on the part of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and / or affiliated labs and more pressure needs to be placed on the CCP for an explanation.  The question of whether SARS-COV-2 was lab-modified for sinister reasons or for good is not up for debate at the moment. 

What is in question is which of the following options is more plausibly true:

  1. Did SARS-COV-2 evolve naturally from animals to humans; or
  2. Was SARS-COV-2 manipulated, helping the virus to be immediately infectious to humans and then released from a lab (whether by accident or on purpose)?

Here is a timeline that I have created from various sources.  I trust it will help with your deliberations.


Study: Bat Coronaviruses could be “enhanced” to infect humans without the need for evolutionary change. Link

“Therefore, to examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein—from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats1—in the context of the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone. The hybrid virus allowed us to evaluate the ability of the novel spike protein to cause disease independently of other necessary adaptive mutations in its natural backbone.”

Apr 2017

Fauci: ‘No doubt’ Trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak. 

[There is nothing like accentuating the risk of something with a new boss (e.g. a pandemic, climate change) before budgets are set.]

Dec 2018

Study: SARS-Like Coronavirus WIV1-CoV needs part of the SARS-COV Spike protein to replicate in Egyptian Fruit Bats.  Link

“However, most SARS-like viruses from bats do not bind the human receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). For example, a recombinant virus based on a consensus sequence of SARS-like viruses from bats could not be cultured unless a part of the spike protein was exchanged with SARS-CoV spike protein.”

Feb 2019

Final NIH grant renewal for WIV research into “spillover potential for bat coronaviruses to humans.”

It was difficult to find any articles regarding the specific research conducted into the “spillover potential for bat coronaviruses to humans” from Feb 2019 through Apr 2020. 

2014 – Apr 2020

NIH funds WIV research (via EcoHealth Alliance) into “spillover potential for bat coronaviruses to humans.”  Funding continued until Apr 2020.

In fact, the scope of the research only became apparent after Trump forced Fauci to cancel the grant and the media reacted with their “anti-science” vitriol.  It should be noted that the research grant, managed by EcoHealth Alliance, involved a collaborative effort between US labs and the Wuhan Institute of Virology between 2014 and Apr 2020.  EcoHealth Alliance performed viral “gain of function” research and receives grants from NIH, CDC and Bill Gates.  More about this later.

Feb 2019 – Sep 2020

7 months later … Dr. Yan makes a very interesting point on Page 17 of her paper:

2.2  A postulated synthetic route for the creation of SARS-COV-2

In this sub-section, we describe in more details how each step could be carried out in a laboratory setting using available materials and routine molecular, cellular, and virologic techniques.  A diagram of this process is shown in Figure 8.  We estimate that the whole process could be completed in approximately 6 months.”

Sep 2019

All Wuhan hospital carparks appear very full – satellite images (Taiwan report). 

Satellite images of Wuhan hospital carparks showed they were much fuller around Aug / Sep 2019 compared with Aug / Sep 2018.  A spike in searches for the terms “cough” and “diarrhea,” two symptoms of COVID-19, also occurred on the Chinese internet search engine Baidu at this time. Something serious was going on in Wuhan at this time, although the CCP refute this.  Read into this what you will.   Taiwan is obviously not friendly to China.

Oct 2019

Gates sponsors Event 201 – a global conronavirus pandemic simulation

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation partnered with the World Economic Forum and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security to stage Event 201, a tabletop exercise gauging the economic and societal impact of a globally-spreading coronavirus pandemic.  This simulation allowed participants to game out responses to a global pandemic before it arrived and, depending on who they were, make some very incisive early decisions.  If you watch this brief video carefully, you notice that a Chinese Communist Party official (CDC) participated (4:30).  Knowledge of the existence of SARS-COV-2 at this time would have been very valuable information.

31 Dec 2019

COVID-19 is person-to-person transmissible (Taiwan report)   Dr. Yan was advised of this on the same day.

31 Dec 2019

US CDC received a call from China’s CDC re novel coronavirus.  We don’t know what was discussed with President Trump who was in the process of being impeached.

Late 2019

CCP destroyed all “unauthorised” samples of the virus and only provided genetic material to others.  Why? 

10 Jan 2020

CCP encourages Chinese New Year celebrations in Wuhan and across China.

“For 40 days from January 10 to February 18, China celebrates the Lunar New Year Spring Festival, or Chinese New Year. China’s government estimates people will take 3 billion trips to celebrate in the largest annual human migration in the world.” Why would the CCP encourage this?

11 Jan 2020

China releases genetic data on new coronavirus

Several interesting points to note in this article:

  1. The single (reported) fatality was an elderly male who was a frequent customer at the Wuhan wet markets;
  2. The main focus should be to identify the animal species that transmitted nCoV to humans;
  3. There is no sign of human-to-human spread; and
  4. Vineet Menachery, PhD was quoted twice as an expert.

It should be noted that Dr. Menachery was heavily involved in both the 2015 and 2018 viral gain of function studies funded by EcoHealth Alliance and the NIH.

14 Jan 2020

WHO (CCP) COVID-19 is NOT human-to-human.  The WHO simply repeated the CCP claims about the virus.

18 Jan 2020

Trump “briefed” by CDC – they didn’t predict when virus might come to the US.

23 Jan 2020

CCP locks down Wuhan.

25 Jan 2020

Trump bans travel from China amidst cries of “racist”

3 Feb 2020

WHO: “no need to stop international travel”

Refer to video from the 7:00 minute mark.

6 Feb 2020

CCP urges continued International travel

Refer to video from the 8:00 minute mark.

BEIJING, Feb. 6 (Xinhua) — “China’s civil aviation regulator has required all domestic airlines to strive to ensure services of international routes amid the coronavirus outbreak.”

10 Feb 2020

CCP locks down Chinese Domestic travel

Refer to video from the 8:00 minute mark.

Late 2019 – 30 Mar 2020

CCP Exports:

100,000’s of Chinese to the world, many COVID-19 positive

14 Jan – 30 Mar 2020

CCP Imports:

Billions of COVID-19 medical supplies from the world

21 Feb 2020

CCP “disappears” five (known) dissidents

11 Mar 2020

WHO finally deems COVD-19 a pandemic

23 Mar 2020

CCP reports very low number of COVID-19 deaths

Worldometer data shows the first COVID-19 fatalities after Jan 22 with less than 5,000 total deaths to date.

Up to 45,000 urns are distributed to a dozen funeral homes in Wuhan

Apr 2020

Trump learns of NIH funding for WIV viral gain of function research – forces Fauci to stop funding amidst cries of  “anti-science.

Fauci says White House told NIH to cancel funding for bat virus study.

“Why was it canceled? It was canceled because the NIH was told to cancel it,” Fauci said.

Nothing to see here, Mr. Fauci?

Criticised by 77 Nobel Laureates and many others aligned with WHO and NIH position.

“The grant had been given to EcoHealth Alliance, an organization with headquarters in New York that studies the potential for spillover of animal viruses to humans around the globe. The group collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been at the center of conspiracy theories about how the novel coronavirus originated. Virologists and intelligence agencies agree that the virus evolved in nature and spread from animals to humans.” [Note: this story is from the NY Times.]

A group of 77 Nobel laureates wants the U.S. government to review a grant cancellation for research in China directly related to preventing pandemics. [Is this the equivalent of 97% of scientists agreeing with man-made climate change?]

Let’s contrast these 77 Nobel laureate with just one:

French Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier claims SARS-COV-2 is lab-made.

Debunked and smeared by many aligned with WHO and NIH position

One molecular biologist at the national research centre Le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Alexis Verger, last week tweeted a “reminder” that the professor is known for being anti-vaccinations…”.

[Prediction:  the term “Anti-vaxer” will become as potent a slur as “racist” by mid-2021.]

Sep 2020

Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan publishes paper on how SARS-COV-2 could be lab-made in 6 months.

We’ve finally made it to the hero of this article, Dr. Li-Meng Yan. These two videos summarise her story.

Yan et al present three lines of evidence to support their contention that laboratory manipulation is part of the history of SARS-CoV-2:

  1. The genomic sequence of SARS-COV-2 is suspiciously similar to that of a bat coronavirus discovered by military laboratories in the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China) and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command (Nanjing, China)
  2. The way that the SARS-COV-2 Spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor of human cells resembles that of SARS-COV (SARS from 2003).  The fact that SARS-COV-2 was well-adapted for humans from the start of the outbreak creates a big problem for the natural evolution scenario.
    Research labs including the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) have been successfully carrying out relevant research, both alone and with US researchers (including the EcoHealth Alliance).
    In addition, the WIV (Dr. Zhengli Shi – the “Bat Lady”) has engaged in decades-long coronavirus surveillance studies and therefore owns the world’s largest collection of coronaviruses.  It would appear that the technical barrier is non-existent for the WIV and other related laboratories to carry out and succeed in such Spike protein / ACE2 receptor engineering and gain-of-function research.  Dr. Shi has left her “genomic fingerprints” on SARS-COV-2.
  3. A unique restriction enzyme digestion site exists at either end of the receptor binding motif within the Spike protein.  An unusual furin-cleavage site may have been introduced and inserted at the S1/S2 junction of the Spike protein, which make the virus more deadly to humans.

These aspects of the SARS-COV-2 genome are extremely difficult to reconcile from natural evolution scenario.  This summary is pulled directly from her paper:

Having reflected on Yan’s findings and the data in the timeline, I believe that the theory of lab manipulation of SARS-COV-2 is more plausibly true than not.  As to the motive of the CCP, one cannot be sure unless an independent investigation occurs.

Whether the SARS-COV-2 lab manipulation was intended as a bio-weapon or its escape was simply a mistake, detracts nothing from the CPP’s horrendous actions surrounding the origins of the pandemic.  As a brutal, tyrannical communist regime, they would have had no qualms in sacrificing the people of Wuhan in order to spread the disease, once identified, to achieve their intended purpose.  Whether that purpose was an attempt to create confusion regarding the origin of the virus or worse, to weaken other nations, gaining economic and political power, it must be called out.  But how do you deal with such blatant atrocity?  China is indeed a huge schoolyard bully.

Before I end this article, I want to circle back and emphasise the links between China, the WHO, the NIH and the Bill Gates Foundation.  These relationships appear too often to be coincidences.  Also, Dr. Fauci’s strange behaviours need to be examined:

  • Mask / no mask flip-flopping;
  • Insisting on schools staying locked-down;
  • Insisting that New York State’s handling of the pandemic was successful;
  • Constant negative comments about Hydoxychloroquine, despite overwhelming positive evidence;
  • Positive comments regarding Remdesivir’s weak early trial results;
  • No sense of concern about long-term funding of EcoHealth Alliance who collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology;
  • No comment in opposition to the WHO; and
  • General fear-mongering about normal life “likely not going to happen until the end of 2021.”

This video shows how the mainstream media likes to portray Fauci in an exchange with Republican Senator Rand Paul. Fauci is not a fan of the Swedish approach, mainly because it runs counter to his direction to lock-down hard and wait for a vaccine.  However, what does he say about Rand Paul’s question regarding “herd immunity”?  With COVD-19 deaths in Sweden now averaging 1 per week for the past 2 months, I don’t believe that Senator Paul is “on his own” with the “herd immunity” theory.

I have more to say about Dr. Fauci and the other players above, especially in relation to hard lock-downs and vaccines in an upcoming article.

I believe that if he could do it again, Trump would have ditched Fauci earlier and relied on Health and Human Service Secretary, Alex Azar for pandemic advice.

It’s time to call out the mind tricks of the Sith for all to see.  I hope it’s not too late.

Leave a Reply