Prioritise

[prahy-awr-i-tahyz]

to arrange (items to be attended to) in order of their relative importance.

In society, business or life, people must prioritise scarce resources in order to achieve desired outcomes.  If done well, society flourishes.  If not…

King Solomon wrote in the book of Proverbs Ch. 29, verse 18 that “where there is no vision, the people perish.”

Dr. Stephen Covey agreed with his habit #2 of “begin with the end in mind.”

So, what is the chief end of man?  What should we, as individuals and groups aspire to?  When you get near the end of this article (no peeking!) you’ll discover just how important it is to set an appropriate vision.  It influences all of the other elements in the strategic planning chain:

Strategic Planning chain – from Vision to Priorities

In my article To What End, I wrote about Dr. Covey’s Hedgehog Principle and also about how to set a meaningful purpose, “…one that captures imaginations and draws inexorably toward to the future?”  I also wrote that:

“In their landmark book, Built to Last, Collins and Porras found that long-lived businesses all shared a powerful core ideology.  With it, savvy business leaders redefined the way they interacted with the marketplace.  When focused just on making money, businesses would last for a generation or so and then fade into oblivion.  But when their raison d’ê·tre transcended profit-taking, the hearts and minds of employees and stakeholders turned a venture into an adventure; business as usual into long-lived business.”

The powerful core of any mission is tied to its values.  Some of the most common of these values can be found in various historical writings, codes of behaviour and constitutions.  Liberty, Health, Prosperity, Truth, Love and Equality are just a few of the commonly-held values.

I’ve also written about values in my article The Value of Values: the most important point to make about values is their source.  Did they come from the boardroom or are they transcendent and self-evident?  Here is a collection of values from several very successful businesses:

Quality, Service, Excellence, Trust, Respect, Teamwork, Collaboration.

A strategic objective helps leaders to know when they have arrived at a key outcome.  When an organisation has a large collection of these, it is common for several to be in tension or competition with each other.  Leaders often organise or normalise these using a risk consequence table so that they can make effective decisions.  Pair-wise ranking tools are useful to help leaders align and rate these competing outcomes.  These then become the key factors in establishing priorities.

There is one business reality – almost as sure as death and taxes – the scarcity of critical resources.

So, one would hope that:

  • when we promote our best and brightest to lead and guide us; and
  • when they craft compelling visions, missions, values and strategic objectives; and
  • when these are used to prioritise the application of our critical resources;

then we will achieve great individual, organisational and societal outcomes.

So, what happens when scarce resources are prioritised to achieve interests that appear to be far more political and vested than being genuinely beneficial to individuals, organisations and to society at large? 

Where were the armed forces – the sons and daughters of the deplorables – that should have been deployed to ensure atrocities such as this, never occur?

Australian Defence Force personnel ensuring compliance with COVID-19 mask mandates and stay at home orders on the streets of Sydney.

Watch US Army veteran Matt Zeller respond to the interviewer on MSNBC.

Was King Solomon right?

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn is a Russian author, Nobel Prize winner and survivor of the communist gulags.  Quoting from archive.org  “The Gulag Archipelago is Solzhenitsyn’s masterwork, a vast canvas of camps, prisons, transit centres and secret police, of informers and spies and interrogators and also of heroism, a Stalinist anti-world at the heart of the Soviet Union where the key to survival lay not in hope but in despair. The work is based on the testimony of some two hundred survivors, and on the recollection of Solzhenitsyn’s own eleven years in labour camps and exile. It is both a thoroughly researched document and a feat of literary and imaginative power.”

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn gave a stirring address on the occasion of his acceptance, in London on May 10, 1983, of the Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn in 1975 (File photo/Library of Congress)

In this speech, Solzhenitsyn made several sobering claims.  Some of these are copied below.

“More than half a century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of older people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: “Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”

Since then, I have spent well-nigh 50 years working on the history of our Revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous Revolution that swallowed up some 60 million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: “Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.”…

…The failings of human consciousness, deprived of its divine dimension, have been a determining factor in all the major crimes of this century…

…Dostoevsky warned that “great events could come upon us and catch us intellectually unprepared.” This is precisely what has happened. And he predicted that “the world will be saved only after it has been possessed by the demon of evil.” Whether it really will be saved we shall have to wait and see: this will depend on our conscience, on our spiritual lucidity, on our individual and combined efforts in the face of catastrophic circumstances. But it has already come to pass that the demon of evil, like a whirlwind, triumphantly circles all five continents of the earth…

…We are witnesses to the devastation of the world, be it imposed or voluntarily undergone. The entire 20th century is being sucked into the vortex of atheism and self-destruction…

…Different parts of the world have followed different paths, but today they are all approaching the threshold of a common ruin…

…To achieve its diabolical ends. Communism needs to control a population devoid of religious and national feeling, and this entails the destruction of faith and nationhood…

…It seems more and more apparent that even with the most sophisticated of political manoeuvres, the noose around the neck of mankind draws tighter and more hopeless with every passing decade, and there seems to be no way out for anyone — neither nuclear, nor political, nor economic, nor ecological. That is indeed the way things appear to be…

…With such global events looming over us like mountains, nay, like entire mountain ranges, it may seem incongruous and inappropriate to recall that the primary key to our being or non-being resides in each individual human heart, in the heart’s preference for specific good or evil. Yet this remains true even today, and it is, in fact, the most reliable key we have. The social theories that promised so much have demonstrated their bankruptcy, leaving us at a dead end. The free people of the West could reasonably have been expected to realize that they are beset by numerous freely nurtured falsehoods, and not to allow lies to be foisted upon them so easily. All attempts to find a way out of the plight of today’s world are fruitless unless we redirect our consciousness, in repentance, to the Creator of all: without this, no exit will be illumined, and we shall seek it in vain. The resources we have set aside for ourselves are too impoverished for the task. We must first recognize the horror perpetrated not by some outside force, not by class or national enemies, but within each of us individually, and within every society. This is especially true of a free and highly developed society, for here in particular we have surely brought everything upon ourselves, of our own free will. We ourselves, in our daily unthinking selfishness, are pulling tight that noose…

…Let us ask ourselves: Are not the ideals of our century false? And is not our glib and fashionable terminology just as unsound, a terminology that offers superficial remedies for every difficulty? Each of them, in whatever sphere, must be subjected to a clear-eyed scrutiny while there is still time. The solution to the crisis will not be found along the well-trodden paths of conventional thinking…

…Our life consists not in the pursuit of material success but in the quest for worthy spiritual growth. Our entire earthly existence is but a transitional stage in the movement toward something higher, and we must not stumble and fall, nor must we linger fruitlessly on one rung of the ladder. Material laws alone do not explain our life or give it direction. The laws of physics and physiology will never reveal the indisputable manner in which the Creator constantly, day in and day out, participates in the life of each of us, unfailingly granting us the energy of existence; when this assistance leaves us, we die. And in the life of our entire planet, the Divine Spirit surely moves with no less force: this we must grasp in our dark and terrible hour…

…To the ill-considered hopes of the last two centuries, which have reduced us to insignificance and brought us to the brink of nuclear and non-nuclear death, we can propose only a determined quest for the warm hand of God, which we have so rashly and self-confidently spurned. Only in this way can our eyes be opened to the errors of this unfortunate 20th century and our bands be directed to setting them right. There is nothing else to cling to in the landslide: the combined vision of all the thinkers of the Enlightenment amounts to nothing…

…Our five continents are caught in a whirlwind. But it is during trials such as these that the highest gifts of the human spirit are manifested. If we perish and lose this world, the fault will be ours alone…

Almost 40 years have passed since Solzhenitsyn’s address and I believe the following must be stated: 

Men have forgotten Solzhenitsyn.

“Hope, it is the only thing stronger than fear. A little hope is effective, a lot of hope is dangerous.”
President Snow – The Hunger Games”

These are troubled times.  What we need is hope.  Hope in whom?

“This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which enters the Presence behind the veil.”

Letter to the Hebrews, Chapter 6, verse 19.

What is dis, mis?

Disinformation, misinformation, gas-lighting, propaganda, misdirection and the revision of history – tools used by mainstream and social media technocrats to mislead and control the general public.  Information warfare has been waged on people groups for centuries in one form or another.  However, its reach and effect has expanded exponentially in recent times through the power and money of big tech oligarchs.

Thankfully, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas has dropped bombshell reports outlining the brazen efforts of Google, Facebook and CNN (among many others) to collude with politicians, spreading propaganda that directly affected the US 2020 election.  Thank you to the whistle-blowers for your courage and sacrifice. Despite an abundance of evidence like this, political elites and technocrats continue to target and silence those who pose a threat to their control. 

Why do you write so much about America, JV?  Well, for those who don’t know, my wife and children all have US passports and we all lived in New Mexico for over six years in the early 90’s.  Secondly, what happens in America, often spreads to our shores soon afterwards.

Caroline Jack has written a useful article titled “Lexicon of Lies,” defining each of the deceptive literary devices used and how to identify them when navigating the net.  You may find it useful.

FYI, I ceased using Google in late 2020 as it curates returned information based on coders’ left-wing bias.  I now use the Duck Duck Go Web browser.

Vulcanised or Balkanised?

Is mankind getting along better in society today or are we sliding, inexorably towards chaos and anarchy? 

Our modern-day stresses include ground-hog-day COVID lockdowns that crush small business and vaccine mandates that threaten the freedoms of the vaccine-hesitant. Are these helping to vulcanise relationships in the free, democratic West or are we being pitted against each other, now heading towards brutal conflict, as in pre-WWI Balkan states?

US Silver Coin Melt Values End June 2013 Down 37% For The Year

The term: the American Trinity is defined by the three values of:

  1. E Pluribus Unum (out of the many, one)
  2. Liberty; and
  3. In God We Trust

and was first coined by nationally syndicated radio talk show host and best-selling author Dennis Prager.  This 5-minute video describes these values and is definitely worth the watch. Prager argues that this trinity of values, imprinted on every US coin, has enabled America to become the most prosperous and compassionate nation in history.

Slowly for decades, and now very suddenly…the long march through the institutions…the inculcation of cultural Marxism.  If you analyse common MSM narratives you’ll soon discover that:

  1. Everyone is a victim or an aggressor;
  2. Safety is far more important than liberty; and
  3. In Science, not God, We Trust.

Well, I’d like to respond with another trinity of sorts; three articles that I trust will help to lay bare this modern-day deception.  Each article addresses a wound that just won’t heal in society today; a boil that must be lanced and balm applied.  Until we find answers to the following questions, Prager’s holy trinity may be displaced permanently and all hell will break loose.

  1. Did COVID-19 come from the Wuhan wet market or was it a leaked bio-weapon from a Chinese Communist Party P4 lab?  Did Fauci hide the truth of this to pursue his universal vaccination agenda?
  2. Did former VP Joe Biden really get 15 Million more votes in the 2020 US Election than Barack Obama did in 2012 or was it stolen from Trump under the cover of COVID?
  3. Were the January 6th 2021 US Capital riots an Intelligence failure or an Intelligence operation?

In case you’re not aware of these issues, I’ll explain a little about each, argue why they are important to understand fully, and offer some evidence to help you make an informed decision.

The Science Scientism behind the COVID-19 response

Ladies and gentlemen, we may be seeing before our very eyes the rise of the one-world religion of Scientism, with Tony Fauci as the Pope. He is infallible. Even his lies are the truth – just ask him.  The MSM hang on his every word. It seems he could do no wrong, until…

I wrote about the COVID-19 lab-leak theory in my October 2020 article Nothing to See Here. At the time, the MSM called people like me “wing-nuts.”  Well, if you’ve been paying attention, Tony Fauci and Peter Daszak have been weighed and measured and found wanting.  Their insistence on COVID-19 “jumping” from bats to humans is now challenged seriously in the presence of sound investigative journalism and the result of a Freedom of Information request of Fauci’s emails.  

Kudos to investigative journalist Natalie Winters from The National Pulse for her series of articles on Fauci and Daszak that forced this topic to be covered by the MSM and for the Lancet Journal to remove Daszak from their COVID origins investigative committee.  Here is a sample:

You’ve got to love the casual way Daszak (President of EcoHealth Alliance – the NGO back-channel that Fauci used to continue GOF research) describes the outcomes of the Gain of Function research that he funded at the Wuhan lab.

“Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS.  We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS.  So, we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we… Well, I didn’t do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work.  You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells.  At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people.  You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.”

A NY Post article demonstrates Peter Daszak’s clear conflict of interest when refuting the lab-leak theory in early 2020: 

“’Jumps’ across species require time for a virus to adapt, and it would likely infect at least one intermediate species before transmission to humans. But tests of 80,000 animal samples in the first infected areas of China all came back negative for COVID-19.  And the bat species most likely to carry coronaviruses dwells 1,000 miles away from Wuhan and would have been in hibernation when the first cases appeared.”

David Baltimore, president emeritus and Distinguished Professor of Biology at Caltech is a virologist who received the Nobel Prize for his research into viral genetics.  He has also weighed into the discussion on COVID-19 origins.    Baltimore wrote:

“When I first saw the sequence of the furin cleavage site—as I’ve said, other beta coronaviruses don’t have that site—it seemed to me a reasonable hypothesis that somebody had put it in there.  Now, I don’t know if that’s true or not, but I do know that it’s a hypothesis that must be taken seriously.”

This aligns with the findings of the great Chinese whistle-blower Dr. Li-Meng Yan, as reported in a previous article.  “Conspiracy theory” cried the MSM as scientists were paraded out to discredit Dr. Yan’s work.  Do we see any retractions?

‘You don’t know what you’re talking about!’: Fauci LOSES IT with Sen. Rand Paul over Wuhan lab funding accusations

Senator Rand Paul confronted Tony Fauci for lying to congress about the NIH funding dangerous gain of function research.    Fauci doubled down, telling Senator Paul “you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly.”  He claimed that only NIH scientists are capable of interpreting the definition of “gain of function.”

Here is the definition of GOF from the NIH website:

“The term gain-of-function (GOF) research describes a type of research that modifies a biological agent so that it confers new or enhanced activity to that agent.”

This article includes an excerpt from a letter to Dr. Ralph Baric regarding GOF research funding:

“NIAID has determined that the above referenced grant may include Gain of Function (GOF) research that is subject to the recently-announced U.S. Government funding pause … The following specific aims appear to involve research covered under the pause: Project 1: Role of Uncharacterized Genes in High Pathogenic Human Coronavirus Infect — Ralph S. Baric, Ph.D. — Project Leader.

SkyNews Australia investigative journalist and reporter Sharri Markson has also done extensive investigation into the origins of COVID-19.  She will reveal all in her new book titled “What really happened in Wuhan?” due for release in September 2021.

Is Fauci’s agenda really about public health?

Early, detailed knowledge of the origins of SARS-COV-2 would have laid a clear response platform for medical professionals around the world.  Data that are indispensable for research (still being withheld by the CCP) include full details of the first known infected people in Wuhan as well as comprehensive analyses of blood samples from all over Hubei province in the run-up to the outbreak.  If the virus was known to have leaked from a lab, the response to the CCP and the ability to demand access to the original virus DNA would have been more immediate and powerful.

It would appear that Fauci’s trust in and relationship with the Wuhan Institute of Virology had compromised his decision-making.  When Fauci initially carried water for the CCP, by claiming that SARS-COV-2 was not human-to-human transmissible and by criticising Trump’s Chinese travel ban, he had the potential to cause large-scale infection in the US in early 2020.

Before we continue, you will need to know a little more about how Tony Fauci controls medical research funding across the US and influences the same across the globe.  In his 37 years as head of the NIAID, Fauci has directly influenced research funding in the order of hundreds of Billions of dollars.  The other mind-blowing fact is that every patent developed by the government allows for selected (favoured) employees to receive ongoing royalties – up to $150 k per year.  Listen from the 6:00 minute mark here.

Do you find it strange that formal agreement documents were signed for ownership of the COVID-19 Moderna vaccine on Dec 12 2019 (before COVID-19 was even recognised as existing)?

It’s becoming patently obvious (pardon the pun) that Fauci’s influence on coronavirus vaccine development has been going on for a long time and now we are only seeing the tip of the ice-berg.  How is it conceivable that the regulatory body responsible for an industry, benefits financially from that same industry in such a massive way.  Perhaps the moniker of “Godfather” is more apt than “Pope”?

The Pandemic Virus Industrial Complex

I pulled the following quote from an article:

“In 2015, Dr. Peter Daszak…stated:

‘We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine.  A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype.  We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.’

Sounds an awful lot like what we’re facing right now, doesn’t it?  At the end of the day, this pandemic has primarily been about profit and the shifting of wealth, from the lower- and middle-classes to the already ultra-wealthy. This is a war on the public, waged using biological weapons and information warfare, with the ultimate goal of “resetting” life and commerce as we know it.”

I couldn’t find the source of Daszak’s quote, but the sentiment aligns with the work of Natalie Winters referenced earlier.   Before I leave Daszak, a quick word about his company EcoHealth Alliance.  As an NGO President, he learnt quickly how to seek grant money using the keywords “pandemic” and “climate change” in his proposals.  These two are now being inextricably linked by Daszak (and Greta Thunberg’s minders) and it is a highly lucrative and potent fear-inducing cocktail. A quote from an article that is the new talking point for EcoHealth warriors:

“..there was a strong correlation between the pandemic and the environmental crisis: deforestation and the wildlife trade heighten the likelihood of viruses leaping the species boundary; air pollution increases human vulnerability by weakening respiratory systems; and the expansion of air travel allows epidemics to spread more quickly. “The scientific evidence shows they are interconnected and part of the same planetary crisis,” he said. “We are living beyond the carrying capacity of the planet so we are putting human health and the health of nature at risk.”

What do you think he means by “Carrying capacity of the planet“?  Sounds to me like there’s an “overpopulation” problem they are trying to fix. Any volunteers?

Is Universal Vaccination the Answer?

I visited my doctor the other day and we discussed the COVID-19 vaccine rollout and the importance of using Israel and an example of vaccine effectiveness (his words).  Israel is a unique case for the world to watch as it has one of the highest rates of fully vaccinated people – 59 % (as of time of writing).  Despite this fact, the US CDC lists Israel on their Level 4 (Very High Risk) destinations for overseas travel.  Over the past few weeks, the numbers of Infections and hospitalisations in Israel has risen very sharply.  Here is an August 6th grab from News Israel Chanel 13 (read the subtitles):

Vaccinations began about 6 months ago in Israel and Pfizer has recently stated that a booster is required.  They are admitting that their medicine has a durability of only about 6 months.  Dr. Robert Malone weighs in on the same Twitter thread, writing “This strikes me as bizarre.  Herd immunity is a well-defined epidemiologic term.  WHO is re-defining it to meet a specific agenda and objective.  More propaganda.”

On 9th June 2020 the definition of Herd Immunity included:

“…when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.”

On 13th November 2020 this changed to:

“is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.”

I hope that full access is provided to medical researchers to get to the bottom of this recent surge in cases in Israel.  A lot of countries (including Australia) are watching Israel very closely as they pin their lockdown escape hopes on reaching “herd immunity” through high vaccination levels.

Although a small test case (only 33,600 people) Gibraltar is over 99 % vaccinated

How then do you explain the surge in new cases?

It doesn’t look like herd immunity is achievable using a universal vaccination strategy.  More on this later in the article.

Back to my doctor’s visit.  We then had a brief argument about the approval status of the vaccines in use in Australia.  He said they were all “approved” and I said, “perhaps, but only under Emergency Use.”  We went back an forth a few times repeating this. I decided to research our disagreement further.

Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration has provided a Provisional Determination Notice to a range of vaccines. 

Vaccines are currently being delivered in the US under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). What is that, you may ask?

An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives. (More on this later.)

If you listen to the news (as I think my doctor does) you’ll hear that the vaccines are “Approved.”

These are word games.

I’m currently helping a client implement Management of Change processes and software at their facility.  The MoC process has a two-stage approval.  The Initial Approval allows for the change to be planned only.  In the Plan phase, all relevant stakeholders review the planned change, including all relevant outcome data, so that they can help risk-assess the solution.  The final Approval to Implement a change can only come when all relevant stakeholders have understood the risks of the change and determined that the post-change risk level is worth the investment.  We can only know the risk of the change when we actually know the full impact – both short-term and long-term – of the change.  The risk must include all categories – Safety, Cost, Reputation, Security, Operations etc.  Hence the need for full disclosure of the evidence related to the solution and a diverse range of key stakeholders in the risk-assessment.  As my former boss, LeRoy used to say “No-one has all the answers, but together we do.”

Ladies and gentlemen, whether you acknowledge it or not, you are the subjects of a medical change plan (new vaccines, lockdowns, masks etc.).

Do you believe that it’s appropriate for you to participate in the risk assessment of this change plan, as a key stakeholder before it is implemented?

Or should you simply defer to unelected “experts” to make these life and death decisions, on our behalf? Just asking.

The truth, the full truth and nothing but the truth

Verboten!  Listen to Senator Jacquie Lambie in this series of leaked videos.  Bravo!  You may be a bogan, but at least you care for your constituents.  People need to give their informed consent before taking a vaccine.  Enough of this “Nobel Lie” BS! 

A new pandemic playbook?

Let’s list the problems with the current response to COVID-19 in most countries (other than Sweden):

  1. quarantine the healthy instead of the vulnerable (many of the problems below are also addressed.  PANDATA )  
  2. have utter faith in masks
  3. assume high levels of asymptomatic spread;
  4. reject effective therapeutics, even if they are safe and cheap (more later in this article); and
  5. do not include those previously infected in herd immunity calculations.

Fauci has been wrong on so many important aspects of the virus.  In fact, his health recommendations have been down-right deadly.  One key measure shows a current mortality rate of about 1900 / Million in the USA which boasts the most modern of healthcare facilities versus a mortality rate of about 306 / Million in India with higher levels of poverty, higher density populations and poorer healthcare systems.  What is unfortunate is that many Western nations including Australia have taken their lead on virus response from Dr. Fauci and the CDC. 

Despite all of this, Tony Fauci has been lauded by the MSM; his words as though coming from the Holy See himself.  He has stated that attacks on him are the same as attacks on science itself!  After all of the obvious lies and misrepresentations, how and why would his leadership be sought?  In fact, the only thing he has been consistent about is his insistence that things will not get back to normal until everyone is vaccinated.   

No Dissenting Voices

As disturbing as all of this may be, my prediction from October 2020 is now becoming a reality:

“[Prediction:  the term “Anti-vaxxer” will become as potent a slur as ‘racist’ by mid-2021.]”

When Rosa Parks was told to go to the back of the bus, at least she was allowed on the bus!

Soon, the unvaccinated may be segregated to an even greater degree.

Recently, Dr. Mercola, a very popular health advocate and anti-vaxxer has decided to delete all of his 25 years’ worth of articles to placate the thought police.  He was placed atop of a list of the 12 most dangerous people in the US in terms of medical disinformation. 

I am not an anti-vaxxer but believe strongly that everyone has the right to have their say.  I’ve only begun to listen to people like Dr. Mercola when there was such a strong push to de-platform him, and I must say, much of what he talks about is simply common-sense health advice. Without voices like Dr. Mercola’s we will be subject to serious group-think.

“The progress of science presupposes the possibility of unrestricted communications of all results and judgements – freedom of expression and instruction in all realms of intellectual endeavour.”

Albert Einstein

In one of Dr. Mercola’s videos, the following was discussed with his guest, Ivor Cummins:    (I have a copy of the transcript if this video is taken down).

“Propaganda took over … Back in April, we were bang on the money, as you well know.  You know all this yourself.  If you drop your insulin and leptin, and you raise your vitamin D, … if you do all the stuff we’ve talked about for years about cholesterol, insulin, fat, keto, low carb, all the stuff for longevity and health, you just apply essentially the same stuff rapidly, and you’re going to collapse your risk from the virus.  But no-one was allowed to see that.  In fact, the FDA … put in an injunction against a natural health website that was just talking about vitamin D importance.  They told them, ‘You’re not allowed to do that.  It’s not approved.’”

And here, in this video, the Florida USA Governor, Ron DeSantis tells the media to stop judging the unvaccinated

The propaganda was obviously worked.  It seems appropriate now to sympathise with the vax-zealot narrative.  After all, isn’t it the unvaccinated that are causing the rest of humanity to suffer!  It can’t be the government’s fault that society in this predicament!  And as I’ve written before, our betters (Fauci, Gates and the MSM) continue to preach that we won’t get back to normal until everyone is vaccinated.   So why the wait?  The latest COVID claim is that the anti-vaxxers and vaccine hesitant are causing the variants – Delta, Lambda etc.  Well, that all sounds Greek to me.  I’d suggest you type the following into your search engine and see what comes out:  are anti-vaxxers causing covid variants?  Here is the top result from Duck Duck Go.

The MSM and health agencies are colluding with each other in an attempt to drive the universal vaccination narrative, going door to door and even pitting neighbours against each other.

One CNN executive mistakenly cc’d an email to conservative broadcaster, Charlie Kirk while writing to a colleague:

“This is the point re: carrot vs. stick. The carrot is no longer going to work…”

Last Sunday night, on Nine News, I watched story after story crafted to apply pressure to the unvaccinated, including a report coming soon showing vaccination rates by suburb.  What is the purpose of that, other than to focus door-to-door visitations, just like that promoted by the current US administration? 

Whether Australia, the US or virtually any other country, the only thing that leaders talk about is reaching the magical 70% – 80% vaccinated figure.  They have convinced themselves that this is the only way out of this lockdown merry-go-round nightmare and until then, lock down hard, lock down often, mask and intimidate.

The Noble Lie

A very clear, powerful voice has emerged amidst this hot mess.  It is that of Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA technology that undergirds the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

Having developed vaccines his whole life, Malone is the opposite of an anti-vaxxer, yet is very concerned about what the medical overlords are driving through the current COVID response. He is not opposed to COVID-19 vaccines being used, but is highly critical of the “universal vaccination” strategy.  Let me explain why, but first, Malone must be making a lot of the establishment nervous.  If you search for Dr. Robert Malone, you’ll read that he is lying about his credentials.  Good thing we have the way back machine to help us identify revisionist history occurring in real-time!  Just take a look at the propaganda machine in action in this video.

Dr. Malone has been interviewed many times on various podcasts because the MSM will not touch him, and recently on Bannon’s War Room.  In episode number 1137 of the War Room, Malone drops the following bombs:

  1. You really can’t vaccinate your way out of an ongoing pandemic;
  2. Universal vaccination is going to drive vaccine-resistant mutants. That’s inevitable. That’s just fundamental virology;
  3. The current group of vaccines claim to be effective, safe and are essential to help us achieve herd immunity, but there’s a problem.  A leaked slide pack from the CDC admits that even 100 % vaccination cannot stop the Delta variant;
  4. Antibody Dependent Enhancement (where the vaccine-generated antibodies make the infection worse) is a vaccinologist’s worst nightmare.  Blood viral load levels in recent vaccinated infections must be checked to make sure this is not occurring as a result of the vaccines; 
  5. Vaccines should be used to protect the vulnerable, while therapeutics should support the young and healthy as they go about their lives; and
  6. There is no excuse for banning repurposed drugs like Ivermectin in treating COVID-19.

You can read a fuller transcript here or listen to the entire interview here.

Medical professionals need to check the latest rise in infections among the vaccinated in Israel, to determine whether ADE is a factor.    Unfortunately, critical data has not been made available.  ADE figured prominently in almost all coronavirus vaccine trials in animals over the years. A quote from this article:

“Development of vaccines to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and other coronavirus has been difficult to create due to vaccine induced enhanced disease responses in animal models.”

Now that so many have been vaccinated, we need to pray that it does not occur in breakthrough infections among humans.

Dr. Malone has been very critical of the FDA and others involved in COVID-19 vaccine trials because they did not specifically test for ADE and would not disclose the risks of ADE to patients.  It appears that this was a deliberate decision by medical overlords to avoid vaccine hesitancy.  An article about ADE from Dr Malone published by the GHION Journal caused their web-site to be taken down following a coordinated cyber-attack.  This is an excerpt from Malone’s tweet on this event:

“FYI, the “GHION journal” was in fact hit with a large and coordinated DNS attack soon after I posted the link below.

“This morning, our website was hit with a severe denial-of-service attack; according to our Webhosting provider GoDaddy, more than 2 million hits from bots based in China took Ghion Journal offline for more than three hours.

What we do know is that this was a sophisticated effort that could not have been conducted by lone wolves, this was the work of nefarious entities that have the financial means and the technical capacity to shutter websites and silence the free flow of communication”

“There are powerful forces who are hell-bent on censoring independent journalists and denying untold numbers of people the right to make an informed decision vis-à-vis the experimental “vaccines” that are being shoved down our throats.”

An article in response to the DDS attack is provided here by the journal’s editor. 

Perhaps the inventor of the mRNA technology is a conspiracy theorist?

Maybe Joe Rogan is your “go to guy” for COVID facts (please excuse the occasional f-bomb).

Effective Treatments that render Vaccine EUA as “Falsified”

A vast array of repurposed drugs has been trialled and found effective in the early treatment of COVID-19.    When one examines the effect that Ivermectin has on defanging COVID-19 the question must be asked: why have effective therapeutics like, Ivermectin,  Hydroxychloroquine, Vitamin D and Zinc been sullied by the medical establishment and MSM?  Has the motive been purely greed or is there a bigger agenda?  Nigeria, one of the poorest countries in terms of healthcare has a COVID-19 mortality rate of 10 / Million population (cf USA at 1900 / Million).  Nigeria, India, Peru and other poorer nations have resorted to cheap early treatments like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 with great results.  A Christian Missionary couple from Malawi that spoke at a local Baptist church recently was asked about the impact of COVID-19 in their village.  That said that COVID wasn’t even in the top 20 things on locals’ minds.

It was just a matter of time before Big Pharma made an expensive knock-off of Ivermectin.

“Tackling the COVID-19 pandemic requires both prevention via vaccine and targeted treatment for those who contract the virus,” Mikael Dolsten, MD, PhD, Chief Scientific Officer and President of Pfizer said in a statement. “Given the way that SARS-CoV-2 is mutating and the continued global impact of COVID-19, it appears likely that it will be critical to have access to therapeutic options both now and beyond the pandemic.” 

One must ask why was there a ban on therapeutics in the West, as millions of lives could have been saved and lockdowns and economic destruction avoided.  It is difficult to imagine why this could have happened.  It makes no sense.  What has emboldening the MSM to curate the COVID narrative as they are obviously doing?

I’d like to take you back to October 2019, when the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation partnered with the World Economic Forum and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security to stage Event 201, a tabletop exercise gauging the economic and societal impact of a globally-spreading coronavirus pandemic. 

This simulation allowed participants to game out responses to a global pandemic before it arrived and, depending on who they were, make some very incisive early decisions.  If you watch this brief video from the 8:30 to 10:00 min marks, you’ll see how the media was instructed to push the establishment narrative and destroy any opposing views.  It would seem that universal vaccination is the goal, whether it has a good health outcome or not.

The end of Science?

Science has always been driven by debate, based on data.  Data informs decisions and we must always weigh risk versus reward in any policy decision.

In the response to this pandemic, Australia’s leaders have invoked the precautionary principle when it comes to countermeasures including masking and lockdowns.  Massive economic carnage in exchange for a few hundred case numbers and perhaps a few deaths.  However, when it comes to advocating for universal treatment of unapproved vaccines with virtually no long-term safety data, where is the precaution?  We must remember that an Australian politician’s long-term horizon is 2 years (about 2/3 of an election cycle).  We should never let politicians make long-term health decisions on behalf of society.  That’s why we have the Geneva Convention of 1949 and the Hippocratic Oath – do no harm.  No-one should be compelled to receive a medical procedure without informed consent.

People were told in early 2020 that we need “15 days to flatten the curve” and now look at where we are.  Even the Chinese Communist Party-aligned WHO states that lockdowns must be a last resort.  Unfortunately, Australia, the one time COVID favourite is now the last kid chosen on the cricket team.

To add insult to injury, now we are being told that lockdowns will continue until Christmas.  Guess who will get the blame for that. 

A voice of Reason

Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter Navarro have summarised their concerns and outlined a safe, cheap and effective way out of this mess in a recent Washington Times Op-Ed.

Unfortunately, it will require Fauci and Gates to ditch their universal vaccine mantra and for politicians to admit that they made a big mistake.

So, what’s next?

Freedom to work, freedom to assemble and freedom to worship continue to be sacrificed on an illusory alter of safety.  Governments know that they cannot mandate a medical procedure for the general public, so they rely on private businesses to do their bidding.  In the USA, CISCO, Delta, Facebook, Ford, Goldman Sachs, Google, Morgan Stanley, Netflix, The NY Times, Twitter, Uber, United Airlines, Walgreens, Walt Disney Company, Walmart and the Washington Post are the larger companies that have already mandated vaccinations for their employees.  Can you guess how many of Fauci’s staff have been vaccinated? In a May 24 US Senate hearing, it is revealed that only a little over half of NIH, FDA employees have taken coronavirus vaccine.  

In Australia, SPC was the first non-health industry company to mandate vaccination

As I said, what happens in the USA finds its way abroad sooner or later.  Just wait until the Vaccine Passport includes digital currency and cash is no longer allowed.  That’ll make it hard for the unvaccinated to live.

The Big Steal vs the Big Lie

I’ve offered a tremendous amount of evidence in support of large-scale election fraud in my previous articles.  Since then, I have amassed a huge amount of addition evidence, but this will need to wait for a future article.  For now, I just want to mention two people and their contributions to this investigation: Dr. Douglas Frank and Mike Lindell.

Physicist and inventor, Dr, Douglas Frank has cracked the Election theft algorithm.  He found that elector registration databases had been artificially inflated across many states and counties.  The additional “phantom” voters were then used as a credit line to generate just enough votes for Biden, but not too many, in six battle-ground states.  Using a unique key (a sixth order polynomial) for each state, Dr. Frank can predict the actual vote by age for every county in every state that uses voting machines.  He has generated hundreds of graphs just like the one above.  There is no way that such voting patterns could occur naturally in every county, in every state analysed.  The numbers were generated by algorithms with fake ballots printed to match the total numbers. 

Here is a video of Dr. Frank explaining what he discovered (and a whole lot more!!!)  Perhaps he gave too much information?

Here are videos with the results from several states (even ones won by Trump!) Florida. Minnesota. Colorado.

Dr Frank is featured in videos on Mike Lindell’s social media site Frankspeech.com.

Look at Scientific Proof for more about Dr. Frank’s findings and Absolutely 9-0 for more on the cyber-security evidence.

Mike Lindell has been described by the left-leaning paper of the elites – The Atlantic – as the most dangerous man in America to democracy.  More dangerous than Donald Trump and Steve Bannon.

Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, a manufacturing business in Minnesota, has become a magnet for election fraud data since January 9th, 2021.  Since that time, many of the big retailers have refused to sell his products.  He lost 40 % of his regular revenue streams, yet has not laid off any employees due to the public buying his products directly.  His company, MyPillow was also sued by Dominion Voting Systems for $1.6 B in damages.  Despite these attempts to derail his efforts, Lindell has forged ahead, ploughing more than $10M of his personal wealth into verifying data and creating ways to spread the news of election fraud to the masses.

He is holding a cyber-security symposium on August 10 – 12 in South Dakota and is expecting a global audience of about 1 B viewers.

He is inviting cyber-security experts from all over the world to validate the 34 TB of network traffic data that was captured before, during and after the election on November 3rd 2020.  He has offered a bounty of $5 M to any cyber expert that can show the data to be bogus.  The event will be live-streamed on Frankspeech.com and lindelltv.com for those outside of the USA (as MSM will not touch it).  The event will feature a mock election which shows how the algorithms were used to hack the election result.

Some say that Mike is being played and will lose his business.  Others say that he has the goods.  I plan to watch some of the symposium and let you know how it goes.

Let me do you a Dubler

The Election Fraud issue is not dead, despite what the news is saying – or not – about it.  US patriots are in a grind, with many protracted court-cases still in play.

Audits in Arizona and other US states are uncovering large amounts of election fraud, perpetrated under the cover of a COVID-19 response.  After 9 months, this will not go away.  In a recent Rassmussen poll, 55% of Likely U.S. Voters support forensic audits of election results to ensure there was no vote fraud.  The new survey also found that 41% of voters still don’t believe that Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election fairly.

The survey of 900 U.S. Likely Voters was conducted on June 20-21, 2021 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence.

A majority of Republicans (70%) don’t believe Biden won the 2020 presidential election fairly, a belief shared by 10% of Democrats and 45% of unaffiliated voters.

Please watch for more on this in a future article.

Are Trump Supporters domestic terrorists?

On January 6, 2021, hundreds of people stormed the US Capitol in Washington DC and did what?  Most of them trespassed in “the People’s House” and took selfies.  Darren Beattie, Editor of Revolver.news has investigated this thoroughly and challenged the Intelligence community to answer some serious questions about specific unindicted co-conspirators named in relation to the January 6th Capitol protest.  Intelligence agents were able to infiltrate a similar, small-scale attempt to invade the Michigan capitol, yet they were taken by surprise on January 6th

Even though Trump developed the new vaccines in Warp Speed, many of his supporters are vaccine hesitant.  The Biden Administration is working to label as many of them as possible as domestic terrorists as this allows the government greater powers in dealing with dissidents.  The Democrats are currently holding a January 6 Commission.  I wonder what colour shirts future law enforcement officers will be wearing?

I will also cover this further in a future article.

A Confession Lacking Intelligence

Preamble

The purpose of this article is to combat lies and corruption in politics and support the notion of free and fair elections. This is not about Trump. It is about 75 million plus people who value their freedom, many of whom shower before and after work.

Not My President

Donald Trump was threatened with impeachment several times before he was even inaugurated as President on the 20th of January 2017.  Welcome to the Whitehouse, Mr. President!

God only knows how many times he was threatened with impeachment since then.  Here are a just a few. It was obvious that Trump has been a hated man ever since he commenced his Presidency.  His supporters have claimed over the years that mainstream media (MSM), Democrats, Never Trumpers and even some establishment Republicans have vigorously overtly or covertly resisted his efforts to preside over the USA.  Fake News reports, FBI spying on the Trump’s campaign and administration, the entire Russia Collusion hoax and sham Impeachment 1.0 were all cited by conservatives as evidence of bad faith actors.  However, any hint of conspiracy or collusion among these antagonists was scoffed at by the MSM. 

Following a year of big city riots, Big Tech censorship, and COVID-inspired election law changes, conservatives now believe that sufficient evidence of fraud exists, indicating that the 2020 election was systematically stolen from Trump.  In response, the MSM, Democrats and even some Republicans have blamed Trump for inciting the January 6 Capitol riots through his speech, tweets and insistence that the 2020 election was stolen, resulting in Impeachment 2.0.

Saying the Quiet Part out Loud

A most amazing event occurred on the 4th of February when the Time Magazine decided to confess.  To the chagrin of their media partners, Time could no longer contain their gloating.  They just had to say the quiet part out loud.

Molly Ball wrote the article: “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.”  The author basically agreed with conservatives about much of the collusion and conspiracy, except that instead of stealing the election, their actions fortified the result in favour of Biden. In my honest opinion, the article was an arrogant attempt to distribute credit for a brilliantly-designed, dirty, yet hard-fought election win.  Reading between the lines, the author signalled to nationalist populists that the US would never again allow the mistake that was the Donald Trump 45th US Presidency.  The wishes of deplorable, gun-toting, freedom-lovers need to be nullified by their betters and that’s precisely what happened.  She wrote:

“That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.”

Orange Man Bad

The Times article was dropped just prior to the Senate (show)trial of the impeachment of citizen Donald J Trump, but for what reason, I cannot fathom.  It almost begs a response from Trump in the well of the Senate, and it may serve as a tease, but I don’t know whether we’ll see it addressed.  Every Democrat and even some Republicans have declared the term “Election Fraud” verboten and any attempt to refute the narrative: “Biden won fair and square” is being met with the full force of the establishment.  We’ve even seen examples of a modern-day CCP Cultural Revolution “struggle sessions” attempting to force US Senators to concede on this very point.

The Big Lie vs the Big Steal

The New York Time has written several articles recently, claiming that Trump, like Hitler, told his supporters a “Big Lie” – that he actually won in a landslide and the election was stolen from him – and this caused the January 6 Capitol riot.

I don’t intend to discuss the Constitutionality of impeaching a non-sitting President or whether Donald Trump’s speech incited the Capitol rioters.  These will, no doubt, be addressed by Trump’s lawyers during the Senate trial, with this short video unveiling some of the riot’s genuine architects.  What I want to do in this article is to present some compelling, yet rarely seen, evidence of election fraud.  I trust that for all who are willing to examine the evidence, there will be agreement that:

  • the case for fraud is very strong;
  • the election was far more plausibly “stolen” than “fortified;” and
  • a full forensic audit of voting systems and ballot must be completed in order to restore faith in “free and fair” elections in the Western world.

The Receipts – Retail

The Navarro Report compiles hundreds of affidavits of illegal polling behaviours and thousands of documents indicating strong potential and outright evidence for fraud at the “retail” level.

As can be seen from his matrix Peter Navarro concentrates on traditional voter fraud mechanisms and shows the receipts – numbers of dead, under-age, out-of-state voters, late ballots, no chain of custody ballots etc.  His analysis indicates that the votes in dispute far outnumber the “victory” margin.

The Receipts – Wholesale

There is sufficient evidence for election fraud at the “retail” level alone.  However, “wholesale,” system-level election fraud is where the serious allegations have been levelled.  Federal prosecutor Sidney Powell famously threatened to “release the Kraken” and Dominion Systems responded with a 1.3 B law suit.  Powell has since dropped her cases.  Crickets.  Does this mean that there is no evidence of system-level election fraud?  I think there may be some other forces at play.

On the 5th of February, Mike Lindell, owner of the US company, MyPillow, launched a 2-hour docu-movie titled “Absolute Proof” (watched over 100 M times so far across various platforms). Over the past few weeks, Dominion warned him about showing such evidence, but Mike would not back down.  He even invited Dominion voting systems leaders to watch the video and respond.  They are yet to file a law suit against Mike.  From 12-24 min, Col. Phil Waldron (Ret US Army Cyber-Security Expert) summarises the findings of his cyber-security teams and then Mary Fanning (National Intelligence Researcher and Author) references the data collected by blxware and 3NET LABS programmers (from 1 hr 36-49 min mark).

Although not identical with the Waldron cyber teams’ findings, Fanning’s claims of significant foreign interference in the US 2020 Election are consistent with them and with those of Maria Zack’s Leonardo SpA hacking claims (later).  Terry Turchie former Deputy Assistant Director of the Counter-Terrorism Division of the FBI (1 hr 53 min mark) believes that the Intelligence agencies (NSA, FBI, CIA etc.) were all likely compromised.

Col. Phil Waldron testified before the Arizona legislature on Dec 3rd 2020 regarding possible abnormalities in the November 3rd presidential election.  At the 52 min mark of his presentation, Col. Waldron refers to his team of white hat hackers who captured evidence of foreign connections onto the Dominion Voting System network.  Linked here is the affidavit of one anonymous white hat hacker.

This affidavit details several alarming findings:

  • A public network scan of Dominionvoting.com on 2020-11-08 revealed 13 unencrypted passwords for dominion employees, and 75 hashed passwords available in TOR nodes.
  • Server connections include Serbia, Iran and China.
  • A search of the indivisible.org network showed a subdomain which evidences the existence of SCORECARD software in use as part of the Indivisible (formerly ACORN) political group for Obama.
  • Patent assignments from Dominion to Chinese interests.
  • A Decorator Process schematic describing the Scytl “data smoothing” feature.

The white hat hacker concludes their affidavit with: “In my professional opinion, this affidavit presents unambiguous evidence that Dominion Voter Systems and Edison Research have been accessible and were certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China.”

“By using servers and employees connected with rogue actors and hostile foreign influences combined with numerous easily discoverable leaked credentials, these organizations neglectfully allowed foreign adversaries to access data and intentionally provided access to their infrastructure in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent one in 2020. This represents a complete failure of their duty to provide basic cyber security. This is not a technological issue, but rather a governance and basic security issue: if it is not corrected, future elections in the United States and beyond will not be secure and citizens will not have confidence in the results.  I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed this November 23th, 2020.”

Mary Fanning broke a story in March 2017 about a former NSA/CIA contractor-turned whistleblower Dennis Montgomery.  According to the article “Dennis Montgomery developed software programs that could breach secure computer systems and collect massive amounts of data.  That system, THE HAMMER, according to the audio tapes, accessed the phone calls, emails and bank accounts of millions of ordinary Americans.”  Montgomery claims that the government can plant files such as child pornography or state secrets on a target’s computer, setting up the owner of the device for blackmail or framed prosecution.  The article includes several audio files and links to other experts who corroborate Montgomery’s claims.  If you read my former article you may remember Lt. General (Ret.) Thomas McInerny discuss Hammer and Scorecard and how he believed it was used to steal the Nov 3rd 2020 election from Trump in several battleground states.  More than two months have transpired since then and much more evidence is now available.

Back to Jovan Hutton Pulitzer.  He is the inventor of the QR Code scanning technology, holding hundreds of patents.  Pulitzer presented to the Georgia State Senate Sub-committee hearing on election integrity on Dec 30 2020.  He proposed to use his expertise (free of charge) to determine which ballots were genuinely mailed (and folded), filled in by hand versus ballots that were printed, filled in by the printer and not mailed, but scanned as though they were.

Pulitzer claims to be able to determine, within a few hours, the number of legal ballots which should be included in the vote tally and those to be excluded in the whole state of Georgia.  After the presentation, the Georgia Senate sub-committee attempted to conduct a full forensic audit of voting machines and ballots using Phil Waldron and Jovan Hutton Pulitzer.  However, the audit was challenged and delayed in the State courts.  Since that time, Democrat Senators replaced Republican Senators in Georgia and every Senate sub-committee member was replaced.  A full forensic audit of voting machines and ballots is no longer a priority.

At the time of publishing this article, a similar Senate sub-committee in Maricopa County, Arizona was fighting through the courts to conduct a full forensic audit of voting machines and ballots using the services of Mr. Waldron and Mr. Pulitzer.  The Maricopa County board of election supervisors is doing everything in their power to resist subpoenas and avoid handing over the election data. If the election was free and fair, why not hand over the data and prove it?

In a separate video, Pulitzer identifies a hacker from China, connected during the Georgia Senate run-off election (19 min mark). 

Dominion claims that their machines are not connected to the internet during the election process. Hmmm.

Reverse-Engineering

The brilliant mathematician, Edward Solomon identified an inexplicable repetition of identical vote ratios (Trump to Biden) occurring several times consecutively in US voting precincts and then jumping to another precinct and doing the same.

He provides an irrefutable theory for how Biden made up significant votes between late Nov 3 and Nov 7 when he was declared the winner of the election.  Solomon produced several videos for other states also as well as a simulation of the vote switching using the Starcraft video game.

Solomon showed that this type of manipulation was almost impossible via human agency alone at the local voting machine level.  There had to be overall or systematic manipulation using an algorithm that supervised the ratio swapping from precinct to precinct at the appropriate time in several States concurrently.  This, in turn, required the hacking of many voting systems from a central place or via a central algorithm for the US State in question.  As has been shown, there were multiple hacks, but was there a central point of attack?  This is as yet unknown, but it would definitely support Solomon’s theory.

All Roads Lead to Rome

On January 5th 2021 a story broke about the IT department head (Arturo D’Elia) of the Italian aerospace company – Leonardo SpA – who, under the instruction of US CIA agents in the US Embassy in Rome, hacked into the US voting system via a satellite, and uploaded an algorithm designed to shift votes from Trump to Biden.  After listening to the initial audio file, I typed “Italy Did It” in google and ended up with nothing.  I tried DuckDuckGo (which is now my default search engine) and found a treasure trove of information – and several articles debunking the story (as expected).

The non-profit group Nations In Action, headed up by Maria Zack, broke the “Italy Did It” story using the purpose-built web-site. Since the initial audio file (Jan 5), the site has continued to accumulate evidence with several affidavits and numerous video and audio interviews now captured.  I’d suggest you grab a coffee and listen to / watch the 2 Feb Trumpet audio file and the 11 Feb video (begin at 15 min mark) as they are among the best / most comprehensive. There is a lot of info here. I have listened to or watched every one of Maria’s audio / video files and she has not slipped up with any of her facts. She is convinced of what she’s seen and heard and she, in turn, is very convincing.

It is alleged that Arturo D’Elia has copied the US Election data before and after the manipulation onto hard drives.  He has agreed to supply this data once his and his family’s safety and security can be guaranteed.  The weakest aspect of this story is that the current location and state of D’Elia is unknown.  The evidence would also be more credible if D’Elia provided a personal affidavit or there was one from the US Army Intelligence officer who interviewed him, rather than that of the Italian lawyer who investigated this. Otherwise, this story is compelling and difficult to rebut.

The Italian Job or ItalyGate as it is also known by, is not essential for the entire Election Fraud story to be proven true, but it sure would help to accelerate the process.  In fact, D’Elia’s before-and-after election data image would be the key that picks the lock for

the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organisation in the history of American politics.

Joe Biden

The other important point to note about the Italy Did It story is Maria Zack’s allegation of evidence linking former President Obama to the entire scheme via a multi-million dollar cash payment to former Italian President Renzi.  The money trail would be essential to bringing criminal convictions to bear – if the story could be proven true.

I’d like to finish this section on a fun fact. Maria claims that Col. Timothy Matlack, the hand that penned the Declaration of Independence, is her great, great, great, great, great grandfather. Perhaps that’s why she’s such a honey-badger!

Lacking Intelligence

If we were to re-examine the Times article, we would see that credit for the Biden election “fortification” was spread among many organisations.  However, one group was conspicuous by its absence.  When Trump criticised U.S. intelligence agencies, Senator Chuck Schumer warned: “Let me tell you: You take on the intelligence community — they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.”  So, when I state that the Times article is lacking Intelligence, I’m sure you get the pun.

This is actually serious.  There are many things about the US 2020 Election that just don’t make any sense.  The CIA would not provide evidence of foreign election interference as required by Trump’s Executive Order. That’s called obstruction and insubordination.

The FBI and DOJ sat on Hunter Biden’s laptop since late 2019 and only reported that he was under investigation following the election.  Why?

Republican election board supervisors, State Governors and State Legislatures in battleground states all agreed to certify electors quickly and easily, despite numerous court cases being filed.  Why would they be so keen to hand over power to Democrats?  None of the judges wanted to hear a case?  Why?  Republican Bush appointee Chief Justice John Roberts sided with left leaning justices on the Supreme Court for several years now.  Why?  It would seem that many people in important decision-making positions were acting out of fear or were in some way compromised (blackmailed?).  Could the HAMMER have been used?

In a previous article, I wrote about Executive Order 13848.  It was to grant extraordinary powers to the President.  It was to be triggered by a report from the Director of National Intelligence into foreign interference into the US election and was due by Dec 18 2020.  The report was delayed due to the CIA’s defiance of Trump. Times Magazine wrote about an expectation on the left of Trump declaring martial law and their readiness to mobilise large numbers of activists.  As we know, this never occurred.  Trump did not want a civil war.

By the Numbers

Is there sufficient evidence to make the case for Election Fraud more plausibly true than false?  In my honest opinion, the answer is a resounding “Yes” based on the following summary of key elements:

It’s easy to debunk and lie if there are no consequences. However,

“for a signal to be honest, it has to be costly or handicapping.”

Gad Saad, evolutionary psychologist and author of “The Parasitic Mind.”

None of the sources in the table above will gain anything by publishing their findings. Rather, they will face threats, besmirching, cancellation or worse. Maria Zack reports that Arturo D’Elia told his wife about the Leonardo hack after his conscience would not let him rest and that’s how ItalyGate started. Do you think his life is now safe, having implicated the CIA (and Obama) in, allegedly, the greatest heist of the century?

A final point on the these Aspects of Election Fraud. They are independent, yet form a coherent story.  If any one aspect proves to be false, none of the others are discredited.

I will Fear no Evil

I have been watching the Stephen King series “The Stand.”  It has a classic good versus evil plot set in a post-pandemic world where 99 % of the world’s citizens have died.  Randall Flagg, the embodiment of evil, levitates to display his power over the people.

Randall Flagg – the ruler of New Vegas

However, during the 8th episode, in a show trial where three of Flagg’s enemies are committed to death, cracks begin to appear.

Chained in a pool, about to be drowned for his dissent, Larry Underwood – instead of being beaten into submission – shouts “I will fear no evil.”

Shortly after that, two voices from within Randall Flagg’s cohort, follow in Larry’s footsteps and repeat the sentence “I will fear no evil.” The tyrant’s power is lost when people see him for who he is. 

A powerful being appears, destroying Flagg with lightning bolts and all of his followers with the nuclear device intended for Flagg’s enemies. In a way, The Stand appears to be mimicking US politics. I’m not wishing for a kinetic civil war. However, in the end, if freedom-lovers continue to demand truth and transparency and never concede to lies and threats from the corrupt establishment, the tyrant power-base, built on fear, will begin to crumble. Every ruler will be judged by a higher power, whether in this life or the next.

Throughout Impeachment 2.0, the cabal of Democrats, establishment Republicans, Big Tech, MSM and the Intelligence Community appeared to be holding freedom-lovers in an illegal choke-hold and then saying “if you don’t concede that the Election was won fair and square by Biden, we’ll brand you as a domestic terrorist and snuff you out.” Watch Democratic Senator Ted Lieu in this video say this other quiet part out loud (27:20 – 30:00 min mark).  The National Guard has been deployed in Washington DC since before January 20th, with razor wire, as if this was Beijing.  The reason for this continuing occupation is intended to force Donald Trump to say the magic words: “Biden won fair and square.”  Don’t hold your breath.

Donald Trump was acquitted of Impeachment and is free to run for office again.

What should lovers of freedom and democracy do now?

Activate your inner honey-badger.

Gad Saad
Pumas beware: aggressive Honey Badger on prowl
Nick Cummins – former Australian Rugby Union player – The Honey-Badger

It’s time to stand up and to do what’s right and true.

Return of the Outcry

In my previous article, I ended with Gates and Fauci in lock-step, saying that “there will be no return to normal until we have a good vaccine.” Rather, I would now like to declare that there will be no normal until we have a…

RETURN

of the

OUTCRY!

About five years ago, my father-in-law, Fin, gave me a book for Christmas:

“The World Turned Upside Down” by Melanie Phillips.  This award-winning journalist was quite prescient as she linked disparate threads including the demonisation of Israel, rejection of Judeo-Christian values, ejection of the scientific method and an embracing of anti-western, communistic ideals to develop an argument for a quickly-approaching dystopian future.

One of her chapters dealt with the gross alarmism that is man-made climate change.  Al Gore, Prince Charles, Greta Thunberg and others have made repeated, outrageous claims that coastal cities would be inundated, dams would dry up and forests would die within 12 years!  What some of you may not realise is that man-made climate-change is but the latest of a series of scares foisted upon the public.  Over the past few decades, we’ve had acid rain, holes in the ozone layer and even an impending ice age before global warming finally took root.  All of these have been resolved or have simply disappeared on their own.  What’s different with man-made global warming is that a united war has been waged to make a pro-AGW narrative mainstream – grant-addicted scientists on the take, leftist professors and teachers indoctrinating the young, politicians and renewables technology opportunists making personally-favourable policy decisions and the MSM spinning the narrative to the masses.

I have already demonstrated that that the empirical evidence refutes the popular AGW narrative.  More than a dozen articles over the past 12 months support this argument, ending with closing arguments. In that ultimate article, I wrote about the current grand solar minimum, where proponents of natural climate change had predicted a relatively cooler period approaching, despite continually increasing CO2 levels.  AGW proponents argue that man-made CO2 is the cause of global warming while naturalists argue that atmospheric CO2 levels are simply a lag effect of the complex climate system.  Well, what has 2020 demonstrated?

Drastic reductions in international air traffic and heavy industry due to COVID-19 lockdowns has provided a preview of the effect that carbon-neutrality would have on atmospheric CO2 levels.  One would expect to see a significant CO2 drop.  Correct?  However, the destruction of Trillions of dollars in global wealth, the loss of hundreds of thousands of small businesses and the impending starvation of over 100 Million of the world’s poorest has contributed NOTHING measurable towards a reduction in atmospheric CO2.  As can be seen the graphic above, the Keeling Curve has continued to rise steadily as it has done for decades.   The move to “Carbon-neutrality” has been shown during the COVID-19 season to be a sinister and deadly con-job.  Humans have little measurable influence on atmospheric CO2 levels and CO2 has little measurable impact on temperature.  As predicted by climate naturalists, the grand solar minimum has provided some cooling this year with many cold weather records being set with shivery arctic blasts and even summer snow falls!

The global warming “canary in the coal mine” – Greenland’s Surface Mass Balance of snow and ice provides a very useful warming (or cooling) indicator. 

Previously touted to be a cause of rising sea levels, Greenland’s snow and ice had been melting for decades as the world emerged from the Little Ice Age.  This melt has now ceased with Greenland boasting an increase of over 230 GT of snow and ice since Sep 1, 2020.  Go figure!

Despite all of the empirical evidence for CO2 being GOOD for the planet, unscrupulous unelected globalist officials, weak-minded national politicians and a compliant MSM continue to forge ahead with this catastrophic Carbon-neutrality nonsense.

Unsatisfied with the calamity caused by COVID-19 response, the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund and corrupt international leaders (e.g. Princes Charles, President Trudeau and Bill Gates) now plan to rinse and repeat. They intend to use all of the levers of COVID-19 tyranny – lockdowns, forced job losses and economic destruction to re-imagine the world as a global, communist utopia where no-one owns anything and the masses simply live to support the collective.  They have called this The Great Reset and unless We the People hold the line in opposition, the world as we know it will be turned upside down before our eyes. 

We may think that freedom is a natural human desire, but that is simply not the case. In fact, the past 10 months have shown that most people, frightened by COVID-19, are willing to trade their freedom for safety, despite the fact that our very freedoms have been purchased with much blood and treasure.

“We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful.”

C.S. Lewis

How then shall we live? Shall we be men without chests?  Should we only fight in battles that we are likely to win?  How then would have the beaches of Normandy been assailed?  How would Tennyson’s poem “The Charge of the Light Brigade” have become legend, but for the actions of heroes?


It’s time to stand up our God-given rights.  It is still illegal for Australian doctors to prescribe HCQ for COVID-19 use.  It can be prescribed for lupus, rheumatoid arthritis and malaria prevention but not as an early-stage treatment for COVID-19 despite the fact that it is safe, effective and cheap.   Corrupt medical boards should be sued for denying the use of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for early-stage treatment of COVID-19.   This kind of lawfare is occurring in the USA.

The estimated cost in human lives from prohibiting the use of HCQ exceeds

800,000 globally.

Medical tyrants should be brought to justice.  Knowing the corruption in high places and the push to protect vaccine revenue streams, I alluded to a twin of HCQ in my article The Empire Strikes Back.

Quercetin is also effective when used with Zinc and Azithromycin (courtesy of Dr. Vladimir Zelenko). Recently, the drug Ivermectin has also shown great efficacy as a preventive and early-stage COVID-19 treatment. If you have any concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines, Quercetin and Ivermectin treatment options should be investigated, especially while HCQ use remains prohibited.

Regarding the preservation of inalienable rights and freedoms (freedom of speech, freedom of religious expression, the right to bear arms etc.), circumstances may appear grim following the allegations of massive election fraud in the US.

It would appear that the CCP has succeeded in influencing the recent election and installing their Manchurian candidate.  Despite big-tech censorship, a recent Rasmussen poll shows that 47 % of U.S. voters believe that “Democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure that Biden would win.”  The Democrat party machine, the MSM and the techno-tyrants (Google, Youtube and Twitter) are banning any opinion other than the official DNC talking points.  However, it’s no time to give up now.  It’s not over till the fat lady sings and January 20 is the only date mentioned in the US Constitution.  We must continue to fight for freedom, both in the USA and every nation that values free and fair elections.  If you are a person of faith, pray with fervour.  The courts of heaven outrank the US Supreme Court.  Protest peacefully.  Petition your government; if not for you and me, for our children’s children.

This is no prediction, but I’d like to end with a US election possibility that you not be aware of: Executive Order 13848.  In September 2018 President Trump signed into effect an Executive Order that grants extraordinary powers to the President.  It is triggered by a report from the Director of National Intelligence into foreign interference into the US election and is due by Dec 18 2020.  Over the past few weeks, several key figures in Defence and Intelligence have been replaced by President Trump with those loyal to the presidency.  Just yesterday, Attorney General William Barr was replaced.  Are these the actions of a defeated President?  Here is more on this topic from Jo Nova.

Please make the time to watch this great documentary by The Epoch Times and decide who, if anyone is stealing the US election and by extension, the rights and freedoms of patriots across the world.  It is particularly relevant following the recent disclosure of almost 2 million CCP party members embedded within organisations globally.

“Courage Is Rightly Esteemed the First of Human Qualities Because . . . It Is the Quality Which Guarantees All Others.”

Winston Churchill

“Fear not, for I am with you;
Be not dismayed, for I am your God.
I will strengthen you,
Yes, I will help you, I will uphold you with My righteous right hand.”

The OT Prophet Isaiah, Ch 41, verse 10, New King James Version

Coup part Deux

For anyone who read my previous article on 8th November, entitled Little Deuce Coup, you will realise how big a bombshell was dropped.  Since then, I’ve been monitoring the situation closely and want to provide an update.

Firstly, some of the earlier content has not developed any further.  For example, I can find anything new since Nov 8th on the ballot watermark sting story alleged by Dr. Steve Pieczenik.  Jo Nova also covered it, saying:

Jo Nova

“Knowing that the Democrats were likely to cheat, did Donald Trump find honest Intelligence Agents who were still prepared to work for their President and their nation and keep a secret?  Did they manage to watermark ballot papers with QFS blockchain encryption codes in a way that will allow them to catch and prosecute voter fraud? … I’m watching this with red flags thinking: this is exactly what we all want to hear.  Too good to be true?  … We’ll simply have to wait and see whether anything comes of this blockchain watermark claim.”

Who is Sidney Powell and what does 'release the Kraken' mean?
Sidney Powell

Since Nov 8th, a multi-layered collection of voter-fraud evidence has been presented to courts by the Trump legal team.  In addition, there was a MOAB announcement of electronic election fraud by attorney Sidney Powell over the past week.  She links Hammer and Scorecard with Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic vote tabulation software – the latter pair of systems appearing to do precisely what General McInerny described in my earlier article.  That is, moving up to 3 % of votes from one party to another in transit from the voting machine to the final display.  Over the past few days, Sidney Powell said of the evidence for systemic election fraud that “it will be Biblical“ in its proportion and that she will “release the Kraken.”  Follow developments in this case at #KrakenonSteroids unless Twitter bans her.

There is no doubt that the turn-around in election outcomes following the stoppage in vote-counting in Democrat-run cities between 1 am and 5 am on Wednesday 4th November was very strange indeed.  Since then, many data scientists and statisticians from around the globe have volunteered their time to analyse voting data.  This is driven by genuine interest in the US election. We should all NEED TO KNOW that true democracy – the will of the people – was not overturned by bad actors.  A small sample of the results of some of this analysis are included below for those interested in the data.  Just a couple of the voting anomalies include:

Joe Biden came into the 2020 election with an enormous “enthusiasm gap.”  This was manifested in most US counties with lower voter turn-out (~70%) and heavy losses in rural USA.  The Republicans won every close Congressional race (a red-wave).  Despite this, Biden somehow managed to inspire voter turn-out exceeding 100 % in just a few dozen large, urban, Democrat-controlled districts in battleground states e.g.  Montgomery, Pennsylvania.  Sleepy Joe even managed to beat Barak Obama’s vote tally for 2012 in these counties.  How could he have done that?

As is evident from the above graph, there was little change in the number of absentee votes in most counties. Additionally, most counties did not provide much of a shift in the vote. Montgomery County, PA was a significant outlier, both in terms of percentage change in absentee votes, but far more in voter preference.

This next graphic demonstrates what happened from a statistical perspective. The National Pulse story, based on the work of many data scientists stated that data appears to “show a mathematically fraudulent result that is adding votes unnaturally to the tail of the distribution.” In other words, the report alleges that additional ballots were added to counties that were expected to go for Biden “with the assumption the addition will not be noticed due to the already high Dem/Rep ratio.” The statistical term for this type of election fraud is called “stuffing the tail.”

This data is consistent with what has happened in countries like Russia and Venezuela for decades. 

Further analysis of Montgomery data reveals other anomalies that cannot be explained easily. One is that on November 5th at 9:09am, an update in Montgomery County NYT-reported election results saw reported mail-in ballot votes increase by 90,022, but total votes increase by only 9,534 votes. To achieve this, the number of in-person votes needed to be decreased by 80,488.  This is highly unusual.  What needs to be remembered is that the validity of in-person votes can be readily challenged while mail-in votes cannot be verified (signature-matched) once the envelope is discarded.  Any attempt at fraud can more easily be concealed with mail-in votes.

Dominion Voting Machine

The other telling piece of information is that the early morning dump of 90,000 ballots were 95% in favour of Biden. Mail-in ballots counted before and after this dump were ~ 75% in favour of Biden.  There is nothing that can explain this huge change towards Biden, for ONLY this batch of ballots, dropped in the middle of the night while poll watchers were absent.  If this triggers an investigation in Montgomery, PA, it will spread to the other PA districts and states including Michigan, Minnesota and Georgia where similar early-morning mail-in ballots were dumped en masse. This and much more evidence is provided in a Revolver News story. A plausible explanation for the data anomalies is provided in an addendum.

The MSM claim that the Trump campaign has distanced itself from Sidney Powell, perhaps because of her “wild” theories on Dominion Voting Systems.  But the MSM has a very short memory.  Examining the details more closely, you will see that Sidney Powell and Lin Wood, funded by #WeThePeople, have been given free reign to run a different kind of legal campaign to the Trump Team. You’ll also see in the video how CNN has inadvertently helped her case.  A third, high-powered legal team funded by the Amistad Project are also weighing in.

Here’s another little morsel of evidence for electronic election fraud.  The following words were allegedly said by Dominion vote counting software chief programmer Eric Coomer to ANTIFA members and cell leaders on conference calls.

“Don’t worry about the election, Trump’s not gonna win. I made f**king sure of that!”

Eric Coomer – Dominion chief programmer

Have you heard something about the US military seizing servers tabulating US Election results in Germany soon after November 5th?  If you have, you may respond by stating that this has been debunked by most of the MSM. 

Well, here is an interesting twist to this story by Turcopolier – a retired Army officer with two terriers. I suggest you check out his blog. I love the title: Sic Semper Tyrannis meaning “thus always to tyrants”. It suggests that bad outcomes should or eventually will befall tyrants.  I found this by reading through comments in the bowels of another of JoNova’s blogs. Sometimes you’ve just got to look in the most obscure places on the internet to find the best stories.

Why is there such relentless, united international effort against investigating the evidence of fraud? Why such a rush to sweep Biden into the oval office?  Well, perhaps, because this could be the biggest and most elaborate crime in US history.  Could it be that many politicians, both US Democrat and Republican and foreign leaders have benefited from such “election insurance” over many years?  Will they now stop at nothing, even blatant deception, suppression of alternative news, even threats to the children of election board officials in an attempt to silence the trump team and continue with their lies?  Or could there be an even more sinister deception that they are attempting to hide, with Team Trump being the last and only real line of defence standing in their way?

Buckle up.  December 8th is the Safe Harbour date on the US Election timeline.  I’m predicting some wild weather in the US political ocean between now and then.  Let’s see whether there really is a Kraken lurking in the deep or whether Sidney Powell has trashed her reputation over a wild conspiracy theory.

Here’s a late-breaking tweet from Lin Wood (#WeThePeople) to Brad Raffensperger, corrupt Georgia Secretary of State.

“Would someone ask my never-to-be friend Brad Raffensperger @GaSecofState if he has seen this tape of election fraud at State Farm Arena in Fulton Co., GA. Several people have seen it. Many more will see it soon. Video camera eye does not lie. How do you spell Election Fraud?”

Little Deuce Coup

“Little deuce Coup.  You don’t know what I got.”  These are the first two lines from the Beach Boys hit song “Little Deuce Coupe.”

1932 Coupe leader – USA, Ford
1971 Coup leader – Uganda, Idi Amin

That’s exactly what the Democrats are saying in the 2020 US Presidential election.  What do they have under the hood of their coup that they are using to attempt to steal the 2020 election from Trump?  Note, I do know how to spell “coupe” and au contraire, I believe that President Trump knows precisely what they got!

As voters all over the USA went to bed on late Nov 3rd, President Trump looked to have a handy lead in many key battleground states and was on track to retain the Whitehouse.  Then the voting stopped before midnight and strange things were afoot. 

Strange things are afoot (Bill and Ted)

In the morning, Biden had taken the lead and is now poised to take the Whitehouse.  In fact, by the time you read this, Mainstream Media have called the election for Biden.  How did the big turn-around happen in the early hours of Nov 4?

In my opinion, Trump voters had turned out in such numbers that they forced the Dems into making some serious errors.  Panic set in and they dropped the Hammer.  In the early hours of Nov 4, 130 k + ballots were dropped into into Biden’s Michigan Scorecard.  Boom.  Just like that.  Why are those earlier words italicised?  I’ll let you know later.

The Dem’s threw everything at this election – even the kitchen sink.  Dead people voting, out of state voting, post-dating ballots in the Post Office, software glitches reversing vote counts,  and not allowing Republican poll watchers to view ballot counting in key urban polling stations. This, amid other voting irregularities sent Trump lawyers scurrying to the courts. There is no doubt that the recent changes in state electoral laws were all made to favour the Dems – extending voting dates, looser signature matching, bulk mail-outs of ballots (often, to voter rolls that exceed 100% of a state’s eligible voting population).  I don’t have to tell you that all of the above allegations have been debunked, suppressed, refuted or fact-checked by the MSM.  Good thing I know how to outsmart Google to find the links for you!

The Trump legal team is going to court to battle these cases of voter fraud, while the mainstream media chides Trump, hoping to force him to concede.  With Biden’s lead now growing in key battleground states, it looks like even if the fraudulent votes are removed, he may not be close enough to trigger a recount.  However, Trump’s a brawler.  He’s not going to give up without a fight!

However, the macro numbers just don’t seem to add up.  Trump’s total vote of over 71 Million is the largest of any election, beaten only by the Biden figure.  Trump won more non-white voters than any President since 1960, almost doubling his black voter percentage since 2016 and yet Biden, with a huge enthusiasm gap, managed to get more blacks to vote for him than for Obama.  Is that possible?  Then, although Biden now leads Trump in the race for the Whitehouse, the Dems did not win the Senate and have lost several Congress seats.  Why would people vote for Biden only on their ticket and NOT vote for their local Congressman?

These strange things invited many analysts to dig deeper.  They dug so deep, they ended up in … you know where!

Two months ago, a Revolver News story predicted a “Colour Revolution” would take place via the Democrat-run “Transition Integrity Project.”  From this September 4th report:

“In our previous report on Never Trump State Department official George Kent, Revolver News drew attention to the ominous similarities between the strategies and tactics the United States government employs in so-called “Color Revolutions” and the coordinated efforts of government bureaucrats, NGOs, and the media to oust President Trump.

This follow-up report will focus specifically on how the “contested election scenario” we are hearing so much about plays into the Color Revolution framework — indeed, sowing doubt about the democratic legitimacy of the target and coupling it with calls for massive “mostly peaceful” demonstrations comes straight out of the Color Revolution playbook.  And this is precisely the messaging we’ve seen from by those same key players in media, government, and the Democrat Party machine, most prominently from a shadowy George Soros-linked group known as the Transition Integrity Project — more about them soon.

First, a quick note on Color Revolutions. A ‘Color Revolution’ in this context refers to a specific type of coordinated attack that the United States government has been known to deploy against foreign regimes, particularly in Eastern Europe deemed to be “authoritarian” and hostile to American interests. Rather than using a direct military intervention to effect regime change as in Iraq, Color Revolutions attack a foreign regime by contesting its electoral legitimacy, organizing mass protests and acts of civil disobedience, and leveraging media contacts to ensure favorable coverage to their agenda in the Western press.

It would be disturbing enough to note a coordinated effort to use these exact same strategies and tactics domestically to undermine or overthrow President Trump.  The ominous nature of what we see unfolding before us only truly hits home when one realizes that the people who specialize in these Color Revolution regime change operations overseas are, literally, the very same people attempting to overthrow Trump by using the very same playbook.  Given that the most famous Color Revolution was the “Orange Revolution” in the Ukraine, and that Black Lives Matter is being used as a key component of the domestic Color Revolution against Trump, we can encapsulate our thesis at Revolver with the simple remark that “Black is the New Orange.”

This notion of a “Color Revolution” plot was laughed off by the mainstream media as a tin-foil hat conspiracy theory.  However, some leaked Zoom footage tells a different story.  Begin listening at the 4 min mark.    I doubt whether you’ve heard about this on the mainstream media.  Does that shock you?  That’s nothing compared what’s coming below. Please keep reading.

How many of you have heard of THE HAMMER and its inventor – Dennis Montgomery? Listen to this audio above. Shocking.  In 2015, he blew the whistle 18 times and for this, he’s been smeared and debunked by the media as is normal practice.  In a nutshell, in February 2009, the Obama administration commandeered a powerful supercomputer system known as THE HAMMER.  It includes an exploit application known as the SCORECARD that is capable of hacking into elections and stealing the vote, according to its developer Dennis Montgomery. Lt. General McIntyre does not know why Trump has not responded to this recent information on the Hammer and Scorecard. You’ll find out later in this article why Trump appears to be moving slowly on what seems to be major election fraud.

THE WHISTLEBLOWER TAPES, confidential audio recordings released by US District Judge G. Murray Snow in Nov 2015, revealed that SCORECARD was deployed by the Obama team against Florida election computers to steal the 2012 presidential election on behalf of Barak Obama and Joe Biden.

According to a retired Lt. General Thomas McInerney and General Michael Flynns’ attorney, Sidney Powell, SCORECARD has been activated to steal the election from Donald Trump on behalf of Joe Biden once again.  You may have heard in the news recently about a software “glitch” that was detected to have changed vote tallies in one electorate.    Well, it would appear that CNN has unwittingly demonstrated vote switching in real-time on election night.  YOU MUST WATCH THIS VIDEO.  (4:20) The dam is breaking and hopefully, the truth gets out before Big Tech attempt to kill it.  The general population must know what’s happened before there is violence in the streets.  Trump is resisting the MSM’s calls to concede and the longer this goes on, the more likely that Antifa, BLM and associated groups will mobilize to attempt to storm the Whitehouse.

This final video has a HUGE, HUGE TWIST.  Could this be true??? I was speechless when I watched it.  WOW.

In many respects, I wish this was a conspiracy theory, but it appears to be the real deal.  If these claims are true, this will make every other story of 2020 look like a nothing-burger.  The USA is facing, potentially the most damaging political crisis in the USA’s 200+ year history. 

When President Trump took the oath of office in early 2017, we swore on the Bible that “…I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

In 1754, at a meeting of colonial representatives in Albany, New York, Benjamin Franklin proposed a plan for uniting the colonies under a national congress.  When asked by others “What do we have, a republic or a monarchy?” Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.”

I believe that the USA has been, on the whole, a force for good for the world.  It is now under severe attack.  Please pray for the USA, for the truth to be revealed and for genuine justice to prevail.

Idle hands are the devil’s playground

There appears to be widespread and growing evidence of intent to implement population control under a centralised system of world government driven largely by a cabal of oligarchs.  Having made their billions from free market capitalism, they now lurch left in an attempt to implement tyrannical socialism for everybody else.  Some of the key players include Bill Gates, George Soros, Warren Buffet and Ted Turner, supported by “experts” including NIAID Director Tony Fauci and WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

If true, this presents a significant threat to anybody and everybody who values their freedom, their sense of pride and their ability to provide for themselves, their families and the communities within which they live.  This article examines some of the emerging evidence of that apparently ever-increasing threat.

In an amazing example of “life imitating art,” these players appear to be acting the role of

Senator Palpatine in the Star Wars film “The Phantom Menace.”  Palpatine rose to prominence in the Galactic Senate, orchestrating the Clone Wars and playing both sides of the war in order to accumulate political capital.  He leveraged this during the final years of the Galactic Republic in order to ascend to absolute power as the Emperor. Appearing as a benevolent peace-maker, Palpatine had cleverly hidden his dual identity as the Dark Lord of the Sith, Darth Sidious.  Let’s now examine how this story applies to the current

The information in this article is gleaned from several sources, but primarily from a Corbett Report (thanks again, o’l cobber) that raises many questions and concerns about the ideals and behaviours currently expressed by Bill Gates.

To make sure I was drawing on a balance view, I also decided to see what the “fact checkers” had to say about the author.  Here are some comments from rationalwiki.

“The Corbett Report is a Conspiracy-Pseudoscience source that publishes unverifiable information with tinfoil hat conspiracy level, moderate pseudoscience level and low factual reporting……  Ultimately, however, all he achieves is talking to an echo chamber of other dangerous morons about the same nonsense.  He is also a vigorous denier of climate change and doesn’t like the IPCC, Wikipedia, Agenda 21 or Bill Gates.  In conclusion, he is your typical kook…avoiding anything that could damage and challenge the narrative he creates.”

Image

After reading comments like these, I thought that to draw that much flack, at least some of Corbett’s material must be over the target.  I decided to read Corbett’s report and watch his videos.  As I got into it, I checked many of his links for veracity.  Although some of his arguments were not supported by strong evidence, many were.  Further, even the weakly-supported claims, combined with the strongly-supported ones to form a coherent story.  Add to this, my previous, personal findings on Hydroxychloroquine vis-à-vis its COVID-19 early stage treatment efficacy and the flurry of high-level efforts to ban its use.

So, what does all of this mean for this article of mine?  I am confident that it is more plausibly true than false.  Plus, it just makes sense.

A few disclaimers before I begin:

  • I simply don’t trust “fact-checkers.”  They are often political ideologues, posing as honest brokers.  I prefer to do my own research.  In an upcoming article, I plan to write about how the media curates information dissemination and what we can do about it.
  • I am not making any claims about the intent of the characters in this article.  I’ve simply assembled a body of evidence that you can use to draw your own conclusions.
  • Much of the early part of this article either quotes or summarises the Corbett Report. I can’t take much credit and have not used apostrophes, mainly to simplify the look of the article.  
  • The latter half of the article is my own work, informed by a variety of other sources.

Do you trust my research?  If so, keep reading.  Otherwise, please don’t read on.  You may not like what you see.

Bill Gates is no public health expert. He’s not a doctor, an epidemiologist or an infectious diseases researcher.  Yet he has somehow found himself dictating the medical actions required for the world to go ‘back to normal.’  His transformation from a derided computer kingpin to a beloved global health czar is absolutely remarkable.

In less than two decades, Gates has managed to convince the world that he is giving away his fortunes as one of the world’s greatest philanthropists.  However, despite donating over $35 billion to a charitable foundation, during the course of one “Decade of Vaccines,” his net worth has doubled, from $54 billion to over $100 billion.

Could this just be a lucky streak of investment coincidences or is it perhaps due in part to the way that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation interacts with their Foundation Trust?  Could donations to the Foundation often benefit the value of their trust’s assets?

As indicated in a 2016 Al Jazeera News story, Gates spends tens of millions of dollars per year on media partnerships, sponsoring coverage of his program areas across various media platforms.  He funds The Guardian‘s Global Development website; NPR’s global health coverage; Our World in Data website; and BBC coverage of global health and development issues, both through its BBC Media Action organization and the BBC itself.

In addition to this, Gates has made substantial donations to many global Health Institutes and has provided prominent positions of leadership to current WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (chair of the Gates-founded Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, board of the Gates-founded Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and the Gates-funded Stop TB Partnership) and NIAID Director Dr Tony Fauci (Leadership Council of the Gates-founded “Decade of Vaccines”) on various councils and projects.  The WHO’s most recent donor report shows that the Gates Foundation is single-biggest private donor, contributing more than Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Russia and the UK combined.

Gates himself admits that it is not a spirit of selfless generosity that motivates his interest in vaccines and other lucrative health interventions.  He noted that vaccine development offers a 20:1 return on investment.

One must ask: is there something (other than lucre) about Big Pharma and the vaccination process that we’re just not seeing?  Could Gates’ motivation be anything but a case of opportune-altruism?  Does it not make sense to provide vaccines to the world and perhaps make a few Billions on the side?  After all, that’s business and vaccines are an effective way to control certain diseases.  However, vaccines may not be the safest or most cost-effective way.  More on this in another article.

The “Decade of Vaccines” kicked off with a Gates-funded $3.6 million observational study of HPV vaccines in India that, according to a government investigation, violated the human rights of the study participants with “gross violations” of consent and failed to properly report adverse events experienced by the vaccine recipients.  Samiran Nundy, editor emeritus of the National Medical Journal of India lamented that “[t]his is an obvious case where Indians were being used as guinea pigs.”

However, it seemed that wherever Gates went, the Rockerfellers had been there before.  The Rockefellers’ Population Council and other research organisations joined with the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1972 to create a Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation.  By 1995, they were able to report progress in developing a prototype of an anti-hCG-vaccine, causing women to develop antibodies against the hCG hormone and causing them to mis-carry.

A series of scandals over WHO-led vaccination programs in the third world led to allegations that tetanus vaccines in places like the Philippines and Kenya were being laced with hCG in order to implement population control by stealth.  The controversy generated by these stories led global institutions to step back from the campaign to champion population control by vaccine.

But, as usual, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was there to renew interest, working with the UK government to host a “London Summit on Family Planning” in 2012 at which the foundation announced their support for funding the research, development and deployment of injectable contraceptives to the developing world.

Gates openly champions population control, arguing that a broad vaccination program will not just bring about improvements in health, but also a reduction in population rates in the Third World as parents will not require as many children to ensure at least a couple survive to adulthood.  Gates attempts to make Population Control sound more palatable by invoking the term “Reproductive Health.”  However, I contend that the First-World approach of reducing excess births through abortion is nothing less than war on the unborn.  Do the lives of 1,000 black babies aborted in the US each day matter?  And you want to introduce abortion clinics across Africa?  I don’t think that’s what is meant by “flattening the curve,” Mr. Gates.

Population Control has been around for more than two centuries according to a lifesitenews research paper.

Are stories of population control and human rights abuses new?  An article, written by the Catholic pro-life organisation: lifesitenews.com traces this darkness back to the 18th Century.  Concerned about rapid population growth and mankind’s ability to feed itself, economist Thomas Malthus encouraged an active repression and abuse of the poor based on what he believed was their natural inferiority.  He stated that

“instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits.  In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague.”

In doing so he had essentially created and was advocating for a new type of racism; a “scientific” racism by which whole segments of the population were to be discriminated against based on their socioeconomic status. Malthusian thinking gave rise to the eugenics movement 100 years later.  In 1883, Sir Francis Galton, a respected British scholar and cousin of Charles Darwin, first used the term eugenics, meaning “well-born.” Galton believed that the human race could help direct its future by selectively breeding individuals who have “desired” traits. This thinking flourished among the elites.  Hubris has a great way of perpetuating itself!

The eugenics movement of the early twentieth century had been very successful in implementing many of its policies by influencing the American elite.  Perhaps its greatest and most important victory was winning Margaret Sanger to its cause and providing her with the tools and favourable environment in which her initiatives were able to prosper.  Sanger, the infamous founder of Planned Parenthood, would serve as one of the key leaders of an elite group of new “scientific” racists, referred to by Stephen Mosher of the Population Research Institute as the “Population Firm.”  This group was dedicated to forcing Malthus’ principles on the world through a well-coordinated population control program.  The group’s tools would be Sanger’s favourites – birth control, abortion, and sterilization.

In 1948, in an article titled UNESCO: Its Purpose and its Philosophy, Sir Julian Huxley, the President of the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) showed how much Malthusianism had invaded the ranks of UN leaders, when he explained that:

“Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much [that] is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

As the “Population Firm” grew and continues to grow today, much of its financial support came through a small consortium of some of the most influential and wealthy people in the world.  These [people] now put more funds towards population control than the U.S. government.  The world’s newest wealthy men, many of them such as Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, and Ted Turner belonging to the exclusive billionaire’s club, have joined their wealth with the wealth of their Malthusian predecessors to support the many efforts of those in the Population Firm.  

So, what might happen if the intelligentsia is left unchecked?  In March 2006, an author and scientist, Forrest Mims, attended the 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science.  When a kerfuffle broke out at the podium and the cameraman disappeared, Mims began taking notes.  I’d suggest you read his chilling account of a scientist, Dr. Eric R. Pianka speculating about using airborne Ebola to cull the world’s population.  There is no reason to doubt his reporting.

One would hope that Pianka was a lone wolf.  However, if Mims is correct, the virus of elitism had already infected many of his colleagues, giving him a “prolonged standing ovation!”  Is it possible that scientists would consider such an atrocity?  I guess there are precedents.

In a 2009 meeting of billionaires, it was Gates who convinced the others (including Warren Buffet, George Soros, Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey) that the aim of the meeting should be “to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population.”

Here are some very revealing quotes from that 2009 meeting:

“This [population growth] is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed it needs big-brain answers,” said the guest.  “They need to be independent of government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see looming.”

It’s unclear which of the Billionaires offered up this “big-brain” quote, but here are some questions that must be asked:

  • So, because you are rich, does that automatically mean that you are smarter than us?
  • Why do you believe government agencies are unable to deal with such disasters?
  • Why, instead, do you see anti-sovereign nation, globalist agencies like the UN, WHO, World Economic Forum and Open Societies as intellectually superior?  Do they also have bigger brains than our nations’ leaders?

Sir / madam, I must advise you that your Malthusian slip is showing.

And then, if this meeting was so crucial, why all the secrecy? “They wanted to speak rich to rich without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting them as an alternative world government,” the friendly reported said.  There is no doubt that these Billionaires care little for sovereign nations, their laws and the accountability that those institutions demand.

Before I continue, I’d like to write briefly about some of Gates compatriots. Let’s begin with George Soros.  After conducting a straw poll of acquaintances, most people had never heard of George Soros. 

Most don’t know that Soros is feared as a powerful financial predator, has been (rightly) accused of being an uncaring anti-Semite (although he is a Jew) and has spent tens of millions of dollars to help appoint left-leaning activist lawyers, judges and politicians to positions such as mayor, governor and District Attorneys in US local, state and federal legislature. 

You may not have heard of Soros because, like the Harry Potter character Voldemort, one cannot even mention Soros’ name.  In fact, he seems to have such enormous influence that even some of (conservative) Fox News journalists refuse to allow such discussion.  Verboten.

If you were to google what I wrote above, you would probably read how these claims have been debunked and that this is tin-foil hat-wearing, conspiracy-theorist crank-ism.  What they hope you don’t find out is that, despite Soros best efforts to bury old videos and photos of himself, they have resurfaced.    While on the Open Societies web-site, Soros claims that “1944, the year of the German occupation, was my formative experience.  Instead of submitting to our fate we resisted an evil force that was much stronger than we were—yet we prevailed” and “not only did we survive, but we managed to help others.”

However, to Soros’ chagrin, a 1998 60 minutes story that has recently resurfaced and it says something very different.  Check it out and form you own opinion about Soros.  Thanks again, ol’ cobber!

Then there’s Ted Turner.  From a 2008 CBS interview, we learn of his desire to reduce the world’s population by two billion.  At least this is less severe than his 1996 recommendation in the Audubon Magazine of a 95% reduction of humans on Earth!  Turner, like Gates, is convinced that human-made global warming and population control are inextricably linked.

Gates links CO2 (man-made global warming assertion) to Population Control

Please refer to Gates’ 2010 TED talk “Innovating to Zero” to understand Bill’s equation for reducing Carbon Emissions to ZERO.  People appear to be in the way of his fantasy.

So, Corbett appears not to be as whacky as the fact-checkers make him out to be.  He did not say that he had proof of Gates being a eugenicist, but the following facts are simply not in dispute:

Gates’ four drivers for Population Control
  1. Gates is a champion of Population Control
  2. Gates wants every human to be vaccinated
  3. Gates has funded the development of a broad digital identification system (biometrics – not part of Vaccine delivery – yet)
  4. Gates has funded the development of high-tech vaccine delivery technologies including implanted microchips and fluorescent digital tattoos
  5. Gates is a champion of digital currency (cash-less society)
Vaccine delivery technology – dissolvable quantum dot fluorescent microneedle patch

Gates’ primary end is Population Control; to that there is no doubt.  Therefore, the other four are simply means to that end.

So, let’s do a thought experiment using Gates’ own statements and logic.

  1. Every human needs to be vaccinated for life to get back to normal (post-COVID-19);
  2. Vaccine administrators need to know who has been vaccinated and who hasn’t.   Delivering the vaccine using the new technology will create a unique digital ID tattoo on the person.
  3. Knowing who has and who hasn’t been vaccinated will help target the remainder.  This is supported by feedback loop 1 (red).
  4. So how does 5. – digital currency fit into this?  Gates is vague on this one.  However, the Digital ID could also be used to facilitate national and eventually, global electronic payment systems for all financial transactions.  Once cash is no longer is use, a good way to “coerce” anti-vaxers to participate in the program (and receive the Digital ID) would be through financial incentives (or penalties).  This is feedback loop 2 (green).

Points a), b) and c) are straight from the horse’s mouth while d) is a logical extension that may help to explain Gates’ interest in this endeavour.

Both Gates (3:40 – 3:50) and Fauci (first 60 seconds) are in lock-step about the first point of “life not getting back to normal until there is a good vaccine.”  Although vaccines and identity may seem unrelated, Bill Gates has spent the last few years funding research (1:10) that can bring these two ideas together into ONE BIG IDEA.  On a recent “Ask Me Anything” thread on reddit, when asked “What changes are we going to have to make to how businesses operate to maintain our economy while providing social distancing?” Bill Gates answered: “Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.”

All five of Gates’ goals would have been “unthinkable” but a few short years ago, but now some have shifted enormously, although a few are now much closer than anyone may think:

2.            Every human vaccinated;

3.            Every human digitally registered; and

4.            Every human microchipped or digitally tattooed.

The Overton Window taught us that it could take years, if not decades to shift topics that are “unthinkable” among the masses to become mainstream.  If Population Control is such a critical outcome for Gates and his Billionaire super-hero friends that they are willing to spend their Billions on to achieve it, then why wait?

Could some form of Sith mind control technique be applied to the Overton Window to shift the thoughts of millions of freedom-loving humans?  Just what kind of force is needed to convince the entire world’s population to submit to being vaccinated and in doing so, receive a fluorescent digital ID tattooed at the same time? 

Let’s conduct another thought experiment.

Imagine if a deadly new virus spread quickly across the world.  Imagine also that the world’s leaders were caught unaware and that modelling projected death in the millions.  What would most nations’ leaders do in response?  Would they be advised by their health system professionals to take extraordinary steps and even act as though they were on a war footing.  For example, would they:

  • Shut down international and even state borders, decimating the airline and tourism industries;
  • Mandate lockdowns or shelter in place orders for the healthy, to flatten the curve.  That is, to avoid an over-extension of health system capacity;
  • Place recovering, elderly patients in nursing homes to free up hospital beds;
  • Make arbitrary distinctions between essential and non-essential businesses, closing down small businesses, churches and schools and allowing large business, drug injecting rooms and casinos to thrive;
  • Destroy thousands of gyms, restaurants and hair salons permanently for the “health of the many;”
  • Pay people to stay at home, incurring many Trillions of dollars of global debt; and
  • Allow politically-motivated mass gatherings, but arrest anyone who protests the lock-downs?

What would the media do in support of the leaders’ policy positions?  Would they:

  • Flood the zone with information in support of the policy;
  • Refute, debunk, smear and hide information in opposition to it (whether supported by evidence or not);
  • Cancel the social media accounts and publicly shame anyone with a dissenting view; and
  • Focus news incessantly on only pandemic data, avoiding the devastation of lockdowns, and crafting a narrative that delivers leaders with their coveted prize – paralysing fear.

Well, there’s no need to imagine any of this, because it is all actually happening NOW!  However, unless you read the previous article, “Nothing to see here”, you may not realise that these scenarios were gamed out back in October 2019 at Event 201.  All that’s left to the imagination now is what insights Bill Gates, the World Economic Forum and the world’s premier health agencies intended to discover during the desktop simulation event.

When I first wrote (on 22 March 2020) about the possible efficacy of Hydoxychloroquine (HCQ) as an early stage treatment for COVID-19, I thought that the outrage against it was mostly Trump Derangement Syndrome.  Then later, I began to believe that the outrage was likely more to do with protecting the revenue streams of Big Pharma vaccines for COVID-19.  Today, however, it would seem that, although the previous two reasons are valid, a more sinister reason for the anti-HCQ rhetoric exists.

The media hates Trump.

Big Pharma wants to protect future vaccine revenue streams.

Gates wants every human vaccinated as part of his Population Control agenda.

ALL TRUE

It would seem that a cheap, decades-old anti-malaria drug may have been the catalyst for exposing the true intentions of this cabal.  Refusing its use has resulted in hundreds of thousands of excess deaths. Add to this number, escalating suicide rates, undiagnosed cancer, heart disease and other ailments, massive death rates in nursing homes and the impending starvation of an estimated 130 million people in the third world all due to tyrannical responses to the disease. It’s not COVID-19 that is killing people so much as it it the response to it that has caused so much collateral damage both now and well into the future. It would appear that even though SARS-COV-2 was not as deadly as some might have thought (hoped?) it has still gone some way to denting population growth. More significantly, it has made large chunks of the population fearful and maleable.

I’d like to finish with these quotes:

If ‘back to normal’ means acting like there never was a coronavirus problem, I don’t think that’s going to happen until we do have a situation where you can completely protect the population [with a vaccine],’ said Fauci.   

“Humankind has never had a more urgent task than creating broad immunity for coronavirus. Realistically, if we’re going to return to normal, we need to develop a safe, effective vaccine. We need to make billions of doses, we need to get them out to every part of the world, and we need all of this to happen as quickly as possible.”  (Bill Gates).

The Sith are in our midst, but cracks are beginning to appear.

Gates and Fauci have both stated that “there will be no return to normal until we have a good vaccine.”  However, I believe that there will be no return to normal until we have a…….

TO BE CONTINUED.

Nothing to see here

Mind tricks, or mind control, refer to a spectrum

of Force powers which can influence the thoughts

of sentient creatures. Some examples of mind tricks

include persuading a person to do something they

would find unpalatable, creating a sensation of fear,

or causing them to see or hear things that were not

there, including illusions. One sinister variation of

the power is “Force Corruption,” an ability that forces

targets to the user’s side, while slowly draining their

life. It usually works on the weak-minded. The Sith

has attempted mind control in a critical battle of the

What is the origin of SARS-COV2?  The World Health Organization and the world’s medical establishment assures the masses that it jumped from an exotic animal, possibly a bat or a pangolin, to humans via the wet markets in Wuhan, China.  In the Star Wars film, Rogue One, many brave souls risked their lives in an attempt to steal the plans to the Death Star.  I believe that one of the bravest heroes of the current SARS WARS is Dr. Li-Meng Yan.

Dr. Yan is a Chinese virologist who claims to have been aware of person-to-person transmission of COVID-19 in late December 2019 and attempted to communicate the risks to her senior managers in January 2020.  She alleges that the Chinese government and the WHO knew about the person-to-person transmission of COVID-19 earlier than they reported or made public, and suppressed both her research and that of others.  Yan said that she was one of the first scientists in the world to study the outbreak in Wuhan, at the University of Hong Kong (a WHO reference lab), when she was asked to investigate a cluster of SARS-like cases, in December 2019.  Yan has maintained an extensive network of medical professionals from mainland China, one of whom supposedly told Yan about person-to-person transmission of the novel disease on 31 December 2019.  She was told by her superiors “to keep silent and be careful.”  She fled to the United States on 28 April with the intention to deliver “the message of the truth of COVID,” adding that if she tried to tell her story in China, she would be “disappeared and killed.”

Dr. Yan published an initial paper providing evidence of why it is more plausible to believe that SARS-COV-2 was manipulated in late 2019 to become infectious by humans.  She is preparing a follow-up paper to make further claims with the aim of supporting a comprehensive, independent investigation into the origins of SARS-COV2.  The CCP is resisting any such requests (already made by the US, Australian, UK, French and German governments).

I’m sure that it has not escaped your attention that the WHO’s Director-General Tedros Adhanom has been a willing spokesperson for the CCP and therefore, many virologists aligned with the WHO have criticised her work.  I am not a virologist, but can read and understand some basic scientific concepts.  Having read her report, examined her and other relevant evidence and created a time-line of events, I agree with Dr. Yan’s assessment.  There appears to be ample evidence of viral “function-gain” manipulation on the part of the Wuhan Institute of Virology and / or affiliated labs and more pressure needs to be placed on the CCP for an explanation.  The question of whether SARS-COV-2 was lab-modified for sinister reasons or for good is not up for debate at the moment. 

What is in question is which of the following options is more plausibly true:

  1. Did SARS-COV-2 evolve naturally from animals to humans; or
  2. Was SARS-COV-2 manipulated, helping the virus to be immediately infectious to humans and then released from a lab (whether by accident or on purpose)?

Here is a timeline that I have created from various sources.  I trust it will help with your deliberations.

2105

Study: Bat Coronaviruses could be “enhanced” to infect humans without the need for evolutionary change. Link

“Therefore, to examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein—from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats1—in the context of the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone. The hybrid virus allowed us to evaluate the ability of the novel spike protein to cause disease independently of other necessary adaptive mutations in its natural backbone.”

Apr 2017

Fauci: ‘No doubt’ Trump will face surprise infectious disease outbreak. 

[There is nothing like accentuating the risk of something with a new boss (e.g. a pandemic, climate change) before budgets are set.]

Dec 2018

Study: SARS-Like Coronavirus WIV1-CoV needs part of the SARS-COV Spike protein to replicate in Egyptian Fruit Bats.  Link

“However, most SARS-like viruses from bats do not bind the human receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). For example, a recombinant virus based on a consensus sequence of SARS-like viruses from bats could not be cultured unless a part of the spike protein was exchanged with SARS-CoV spike protein.”

Feb 2019

Final NIH grant renewal for WIV research into “spillover potential for bat coronaviruses to humans.”

It was difficult to find any articles regarding the specific research conducted into the “spillover potential for bat coronaviruses to humans” from Feb 2019 through Apr 2020. 

2014 – Apr 2020

NIH funds WIV research (via EcoHealth Alliance) into “spillover potential for bat coronaviruses to humans.”  Funding continued until Apr 2020.

In fact, the scope of the research only became apparent after Trump forced Fauci to cancel the grant and the media reacted with their “anti-science” vitriol.  It should be noted that the research grant, managed by EcoHealth Alliance, involved a collaborative effort between US labs and the Wuhan Institute of Virology between 2014 and Apr 2020.  EcoHealth Alliance performed viral “gain of function” research and receives grants from NIH, CDC and Bill Gates.  More about this later.

Feb 2019 – Sep 2020

7 months later … Dr. Yan makes a very interesting point on Page 17 of her paper:

2.2  A postulated synthetic route for the creation of SARS-COV-2

In this sub-section, we describe in more details how each step could be carried out in a laboratory setting using available materials and routine molecular, cellular, and virologic techniques.  A diagram of this process is shown in Figure 8.  We estimate that the whole process could be completed in approximately 6 months.”

Sep 2019

All Wuhan hospital carparks appear very full – satellite images (Taiwan report). 

Satellite images of Wuhan hospital carparks showed they were much fuller around Aug / Sep 2019 compared with Aug / Sep 2018.  A spike in searches for the terms “cough” and “diarrhea,” two symptoms of COVID-19, also occurred on the Chinese internet search engine Baidu at this time. Something serious was going on in Wuhan at this time, although the CCP refute this.  Read into this what you will.   Taiwan is obviously not friendly to China.

Oct 2019

Gates sponsors Event 201 – a global conronavirus pandemic simulation

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation partnered with the World Economic Forum and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security to stage Event 201, a tabletop exercise gauging the economic and societal impact of a globally-spreading coronavirus pandemic.  This simulation allowed participants to game out responses to a global pandemic before it arrived and, depending on who they were, make some very incisive early decisions.  If you watch this brief video carefully, you notice that a Chinese Communist Party official (CDC) participated (4:30).  Knowledge of the existence of SARS-COV-2 at this time would have been very valuable information.

31 Dec 2019

COVID-19 is person-to-person transmissible (Taiwan report)   Dr. Yan was advised of this on the same day.

31 Dec 2019

US CDC received a call from China’s CDC re novel coronavirus.  We don’t know what was discussed with President Trump who was in the process of being impeached.

Late 2019

CCP destroyed all “unauthorised” samples of the virus and only provided genetic material to others.  Why? 

10 Jan 2020

CCP encourages Chinese New Year celebrations in Wuhan and across China.

“For 40 days from January 10 to February 18, China celebrates the Lunar New Year Spring Festival, or Chinese New Year. China’s government estimates people will take 3 billion trips to celebrate in the largest annual human migration in the world.” Why would the CCP encourage this?

11 Jan 2020

China releases genetic data on new coronavirus

Several interesting points to note in this article:

  1. The single (reported) fatality was an elderly male who was a frequent customer at the Wuhan wet markets;
  2. The main focus should be to identify the animal species that transmitted nCoV to humans;
  3. There is no sign of human-to-human spread; and
  4. Vineet Menachery, PhD was quoted twice as an expert.

It should be noted that Dr. Menachery was heavily involved in both the 2015 and 2018 viral gain of function studies funded by EcoHealth Alliance and the NIH.

14 Jan 2020

WHO (CCP) COVID-19 is NOT human-to-human.  The WHO simply repeated the CCP claims about the virus.

18 Jan 2020

Trump “briefed” by CDC – they didn’t predict when virus might come to the US.

23 Jan 2020

CCP locks down Wuhan.

25 Jan 2020

Trump bans travel from China amidst cries of “racist”

3 Feb 2020

WHO: “no need to stop international travel”

Refer to video from the 7:00 minute mark.

6 Feb 2020

CCP urges continued International travel

Refer to video from the 8:00 minute mark.

BEIJING, Feb. 6 (Xinhua) — “China’s civil aviation regulator has required all domestic airlines to strive to ensure services of international routes amid the coronavirus outbreak.”

10 Feb 2020

CCP locks down Chinese Domestic travel

Refer to video from the 8:00 minute mark.

Late 2019 – 30 Mar 2020

CCP Exports:

100,000’s of Chinese to the world, many COVID-19 positive

14 Jan – 30 Mar 2020

CCP Imports:

Billions of COVID-19 medical supplies from the world

21 Feb 2020

CCP “disappears” five (known) dissidents

11 Mar 2020

WHO finally deems COVD-19 a pandemic

23 Mar 2020

CCP reports very low number of COVID-19 deaths

Worldometer data shows the first COVID-19 fatalities after Jan 22 with less than 5,000 total deaths to date.

Up to 45,000 urns are distributed to a dozen funeral homes in Wuhan

Apr 2020

Trump learns of NIH funding for WIV viral gain of function research – forces Fauci to stop funding amidst cries of  “anti-science.

Fauci says White House told NIH to cancel funding for bat virus study.

“Why was it canceled? It was canceled because the NIH was told to cancel it,” Fauci said.

Nothing to see here, Mr. Fauci?

Criticised by 77 Nobel Laureates and many others aligned with WHO and NIH position.

“The grant had been given to EcoHealth Alliance, an organization with headquarters in New York that studies the potential for spillover of animal viruses to humans around the globe. The group collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has been at the center of conspiracy theories about how the novel coronavirus originated. Virologists and intelligence agencies agree that the virus evolved in nature and spread from animals to humans.” [Note: this story is from the NY Times.]

A group of 77 Nobel laureates wants the U.S. government to review a grant cancellation for research in China directly related to preventing pandemics. [Is this the equivalent of 97% of scientists agreeing with man-made climate change?]

Let’s contrast these 77 Nobel laureate with just one:

French Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier claims SARS-COV-2 is lab-made.

Debunked and smeared by many aligned with WHO and NIH position

One molecular biologist at the national research centre Le Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Alexis Verger, last week tweeted a “reminder” that the professor is known for being anti-vaccinations…”.

[Prediction:  the term “Anti-vaxer” will become as potent a slur as “racist” by mid-2021.]

Sep 2020

Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan publishes paper on how SARS-COV-2 could be lab-made in 6 months.

We’ve finally made it to the hero of this article, Dr. Li-Meng Yan. These two videos summarise her story.

Yan et al present three lines of evidence to support their contention that laboratory manipulation is part of the history of SARS-CoV-2:

  1. The genomic sequence of SARS-COV-2 is suspiciously similar to that of a bat coronavirus discovered by military laboratories in the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China) and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command (Nanjing, China)
  2. The way that the SARS-COV-2 Spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor of human cells resembles that of SARS-COV (SARS from 2003).  The fact that SARS-COV-2 was well-adapted for humans from the start of the outbreak creates a big problem for the natural evolution scenario.
    Research labs including the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) have been successfully carrying out relevant research, both alone and with US researchers (including the EcoHealth Alliance).
    In addition, the WIV (Dr. Zhengli Shi – the “Bat Lady”) has engaged in decades-long coronavirus surveillance studies and therefore owns the world’s largest collection of coronaviruses.  It would appear that the technical barrier is non-existent for the WIV and other related laboratories to carry out and succeed in such Spike protein / ACE2 receptor engineering and gain-of-function research.  Dr. Shi has left her “genomic fingerprints” on SARS-COV-2.
  3. A unique restriction enzyme digestion site exists at either end of the receptor binding motif within the Spike protein.  An unusual furin-cleavage site may have been introduced and inserted at the S1/S2 junction of the Spike protein, which make the virus more deadly to humans.

These aspects of the SARS-COV-2 genome are extremely difficult to reconcile from natural evolution scenario.  This summary is pulled directly from her paper:

Having reflected on Yan’s findings and the data in the timeline, I believe that the theory of lab manipulation of SARS-COV-2 is more plausibly true than not.  As to the motive of the CCP, one cannot be sure unless an independent investigation occurs.

Whether the SARS-COV-2 lab manipulation was intended as a bio-weapon or its escape was simply a mistake, detracts nothing from the CPP’s horrendous actions surrounding the origins of the pandemic.  As a brutal, tyrannical communist regime, they would have had no qualms in sacrificing the people of Wuhan in order to spread the disease, once identified, to achieve their intended purpose.  Whether that purpose was an attempt to create confusion regarding the origin of the virus or worse, to weaken other nations, gaining economic and political power, it must be called out.  But how do you deal with such blatant atrocity?  China is indeed a huge schoolyard bully.

Before I end this article, I want to circle back and emphasise the links between China, the WHO, the NIH and the Bill Gates Foundation.  These relationships appear too often to be coincidences.  Also, Dr. Fauci’s strange behaviours need to be examined:

  • Mask / no mask flip-flopping;
  • Insisting on schools staying locked-down;
  • Insisting that New York State’s handling of the pandemic was successful;
  • Constant negative comments about Hydoxychloroquine, despite overwhelming positive evidence;
  • Positive comments regarding Remdesivir’s weak early trial results;
  • No sense of concern about long-term funding of EcoHealth Alliance who collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology;
  • No comment in opposition to the WHO; and
  • General fear-mongering about normal life “likely not going to happen until the end of 2021.”

This video shows how the mainstream media likes to portray Fauci in an exchange with Republican Senator Rand Paul. Fauci is not a fan of the Swedish approach, mainly because it runs counter to his direction to lock-down hard and wait for a vaccine.  However, what does he say about Rand Paul’s question regarding “herd immunity”?  With COVD-19 deaths in Sweden now averaging 1 per week for the past 2 months, I don’t believe that Senator Paul is “on his own” with the “herd immunity” theory.

I have more to say about Dr. Fauci and the other players above, especially in relation to hard lock-downs and vaccines in an upcoming article.

I believe that if he could do it again, Trump would have ditched Fauci earlier and relied on Health and Human Service Secretary, Alex Azar for pandemic advice.

It’s time to call out the mind tricks of the Sith for all to see.  I hope it’s not too late.

The Empire Strikes Back

On March 22, 2020 I wrote an article about an old drug – Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and a new hope in the treatment of COVID-19.  Early modelling forecast world-wide death in the millions, with very little trusted data on this novel coronavirus.  With no vaccine on the horizon, we all needed some hope.  On March 19th, President Trump tweeted:

“HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine.”

Since then, much more has been learnt about SARS-COV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 and also about treatment options – but we are still not out of the woods.  Although there is much chatter about promising vaccine trials, scepticism is warranted.  Big Pharma has never developed a vaccine for ANY previous coronavirus – whether SARS, MERS, Swine or Bird Flu.  The annual flu vaccine is 50% effective at best.  Why should SARS-COV-2 be any different?  Billions are being thrown at vaccine development and at “warp speed” too, so, perhaps we’ll be lucky.  Perhaps. However,

Over the past six months,

a disturbance was detected

in the force. Politics, the media

and national Health Institutes united

in an attempt to thwart the use of a very safe

and effective drug, dispensed for decades. It is

against this backdrop that I will now continue

with the next chapter of this saga, which I am calling

Is the New Hope warranted?

At the conclusion of my previous article (http://www.jvpie.com/a-new-hope/), I opined that Africa could be spared much of the atrocity that comes with COVID-19.  Almost 5 months have transpired since then and I’d like to report that most of the poorest, malaria-plagued countries of sub-Saharan Africa have registered COVID-19 mortality rates that are tiny compared with many first-world nations.

Comparing COVID-19 Mortality rates across several regions and continents (www.worldometer.com – Johns Hopkins University)

“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” (Benjamin Franklin).  Considering the figure below, the amount of cure required and the toll on human life exacted by COVID-19 on the hospitalised cannot be overstated.

Three Phases of COVID-19 and its impact on the Mortality rate.

Once infected with COVID-19, a patient’s likelihood of survival drops precipitously from << 1 % to anywhere from 6 to 80% if they go to hospital.  Despite all of the best equipment and best-trained doctors and nurses, going to the ICU is akin to receiving a death sentence – especially in the Italian or New York City Hospitals during the height of the pandemic.  Late treatment options including the new drug Remdesivir and mechanical ventilators just don’t seem to have much of an impact on fatality rates.  The first world has relied heavily on its draconian practices to ensure social separation (masks, distancing, even lock-downs) and its vast array of expensive equipment and new drugs.  However, politics, greed and irrational fear seemed to have gripped areas such as New York City (as a prime example) as the leaders refused to let the healthy work, refused outpatient access to safe, inexpensive early treatment options, placed COVID-19 negative patients into COVID-19 positive hospital wards and sent COVID-19 positive patients back into nursing homes.  You couldn’t have created a worse scenario if you were an incompetent leader.  We’re supposed to protect the sick and vulnerable.  What happened?

New Yorker’s, unable to obtain HCQ as a treatment option were told to quarantine at home.  They were so fearful of going to hospital (thanks to the media and hospital malpractice), that many waited too long. 

Transporting bodies to refrigerated trucks at Elmhurst Hospital NYC

When breathing became laboured, they presented to hospital and far too many departed in body-bags.  In a bold CYA exercise, Democratic NY Governor Anthony Cuomo, provided the state’s leaders with prosecutorial immunity.

Whistleblower Nurse Erin Marie Olszewski at Elmhurst Hospital NYC

  If you have the stomach for it, I’d recommend that you watch this video (thanks, o’l cobber) of a whistle-blower nurse, Erin Marie Olszewski, who worked at NYC’s Elmhurst hospital. 

It shows the effect that panic, greed and politics have on decision-making and hospital care in the midst of a pandemic.  I just hope some legal eagle has the gumption to challenge Cuomo’s decree.  I think this went far beyond gross incompetence.

So, what does the COVID-19 data have to say about the weak adherence of Africa’s poorest people to first-world social separation practices and their bottom quartile level health care for least developed countries?  You know, African slums are just not conducive to a healthy lifestyle.  To all this, I reckon the data says “So What?”  None of these “first world” factors seem to make much difference to COVID-19 infection or survival in the poorest of African nations.  Rather, it seems that Medical Separation combined with early treatment is keeping African COVID-19 patients away from hospitals.  This Medical Separation simply cannot be due superior nutrition.  Rather, the data shows that the comparative youth of Africans is a major factor and the prophylactic and early treatment effects of HCQ may also contribute.  This drug is already in widespread use in the fight against malaria, which kills about 400,000 Africans each year.

By the way, HCQ is sold over the counter in most poorer nations including Africa, Latin America, Iran and yes, even Kazakhstan.

So, is there sufficient evidence to show that HCQ is a significant factor in reducing COVID-19 deaths?  As illustrated in the three phases figure above, there are many potential factors that could impact on COVID-19 mortality.  It is almost impossible to demonstrate the efficacy of HCQ without a controlled trial.  Now let’s consider some more data.

I’d like to compare three geographic locations with similar population densities:

  1. The young, Malaria-ridden, bottom quartile healthcare nation of Sierra Leone (Africa)
  2. The older, top quartile healthcare state of New York, USA; and
  3. The oldest, top quartile healthcare state of Florida, USA.
Comparing three similar locations – three very different COVID-19 outcomes

These were selected because of their geographic similarities and to indicate the impact of HCQ usage versus not.

The Florida mortality rate is higher than that of Sierra Leone, in part because of the age demographic.  In Sierra Leone, 3 % of the population is over 64, while in Florida, the figure is 20%.  Both Sierra Leone and Florida provide HCQ for outpatient use.  New York’s population is not as old as Florida’s, but HCQ is banned in outpatient use in NY City, but not throughout NY State.

If you watched the video I mentioned earlier, you would have seen that the high mortality rates in NYC were also impacted by poor policy decisions.  However, HCQ does appear to play a role in Florida’s lower mortality rate compared to NYC.  Florida has the oldest population, yet its rate is less than one tenth of the US total COVID-19 mortality rate of 524 and one fortieth of NY State’s. Does it prove the case for HCQ? No, not yet. But it does add to the body of evidence. Speaking of a body of evidence…

Dozens of studies strongly support the efficacy of HCQ when used as a preventive or early stage treatment for COVID-19.  The web site: www.c19study.com lists all 76 HCQ studies in the global medical community by infection phase. 

www.c19study.com Summary of global HCQ COVID-19 studies

A summary of these studies shows strong positive support for HCQ as an effective prophylactic for COVID-19 as well as for early treatment.  Late treatment with HCQ shows mixed results which is consistent with the drug’s primary purpose – preventing viral replication.

The web-site www.hcqtrial.com is a study of the efficacy of HCQ usage on COVID-19 mortality.  Quoting from the web-site:

“We originally used the term “country-randomized controlled trial” for this study. –  a medication is being trialled, there is a control group, and a person in the study has their group randomly assigned in advance, independent of their medical status.  As distinct from a retrospective study, the control population is not related to the treatment decisions of the treatment population.  People do not get to choose their group, and that is controlled by the countries (who are effectively running the trial), as opposed to occurring in a natural experiment.  This is perhaps a unique time in history where the world bifurcated over a treatment for a disease, with countries choosing to accept or decline treatment based on the same information, resulting in random selection for patients.

The treatment group has a 77.4% lower death rate.  Confounding factors affect this estimate.  We examined diabetes, obesity, hypertension, life expectancy, population density, urbanization, testing level, and intervention level, which do not account for the effect observed.”

I don’t know how many, if any of the studies (from www.c19study.com) used the randomised, double-blinded method.  One of the earliest studies was undertaken by Professor Didier Raoult, a world-renowned epidemiologist from Marseille, France.

Professor Didier Raoult working with locals to fight malaria in Africa

He was so sure that he’d found an effective treatment for COVID-19 that he rushed his results to the global medical community in March.  It was this study and a tweet from Elon Musk about a US paper on HCQ (more later), which prompted President Trump to issue his historic March 19 tweet. 

Who is this Professor Didier Raoult; achieving rock star status in Marseille? Quoting from a NY Times article:

Raoult likes to think of himself as a doctor first, however, with a moral obligation to treat his patients that supersedes any desire to produce reliable data. “We’re not going to tell someone, ‘Listen, today’s not your lucky day, you’re getting the placebo, you’re going to be dying,’” he told me.  He believes it to be unnecessary, in addition to being unethical, to run randomized controlled trials, or R.C.T.s, of treatments for deadly infectious diseases.  If these have become the accepted standard in biomedical research, Raoult contends, it is only because they appeal to statisticians “who have never seen a patient.” He refers to these scientists disdainfully as “methodologists.”

This is a huge point of contention between Raoult and Fauci.  Fauci has continued to reject HCQ studies as being flawed or anecdotal, purely because they were not performed as part of a Placebo Controlled Trial (PCT).

Raoult’s critics believed that many of his patients would have recovered without the HCQ + Azithromycin treatment, thereby, biasing the results in favour of the drug.  Enter Dr. Vladimir Zelenko.  This GP runs a family clinic in Monroe county, NY State.  He developed a protocol based on Raoult’s work that screened out those likely to recover without treatment and gave a combination of HCQ + Zinc + Azithromycin only to those at risk.

A Dose of Dr. Drew with Dr. Vladimir Zelenko https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ywj-PZTt4g

Even though it’s not a PCT, the results from Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s trial is very well constructed.  He selected patients based on hospitalisation criteria; that is, COVID-19 symptoms with patients that are either:

  1. Over 45;
  2. Under 45 with at least one underlying medical condition; or
  3. Exhibiting toxicity.

Such patients would normally present to hospital, where they had a likely mortality rate of at least 5-10 % according to Zelenko.  His control group was essentially people presenting to hospitals in other parts of NY, not treated with the Zelenko protocol.  He then immediately began a regimen of Hydroxychloroquine + Zinc + Azithromycin.  He freely offers the dosages and substitutes to any who request it.  Seven nations have been in contact with him directly.

The results: 84% of the 669 patients in his initial study did not require hospitalisation and all but 2 of his cohort survived.  That is, the group using his protocol suffered a 0.3% mortality rate compared with 5-10% for the control group, a reduction of at least 94%.

I can just imagine Dr. Fauci mumbling “Anecdotal. Not a randomised study.”

Is there not a way to demonstrate the impact of HCQ without a PRT?  What we require is a scenario where all variables impacting COVID-19 mortality and recovery are held constant for a limited amount of time, with the only variable allowed to change being the use of HCQ, or not.  Well, thanks to the published, found falsified and then retracted Lancet study, we have the very data we need.

In this article by FranceSoir: http://www.francesoir.fr/societe-sante/covid-19-hydroxychloroquine-works-irrefutable-proof Switzerland’s Index of New Dead / New Cases Resolved (nrCFR) clearly shows the impact of HCQ, before and after.

There is no doubt.  HCQ significantly reduces HCQ mortality and improves case recovery.

With all of this compelling evidence available to the news media, wouldn’t you expect that by now, every nation’s leader would be united to ramp-up the development of a very safe, cheap and effective treatment for COVID-19 and prepare to get back to normal life in just a matter of weeks?

The Empire Strikes Back

Well, this is where the Empire enters the frame.  I’m defining the term “Empire” as the unelected officials who maintain the establishment – media, politics, academia and even health.  I’ll mention a few of these in this article:

  • Dr. Tony Fauci – Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  • Anthony Cuomo – Governor of New York State (USA)
  • Social Media – the heads of Google, Youtube and Twitter and their minions
  • Traditional Media – CNN, NY Times, Washington Post, ABC (Australia) and their minions
  • World Health Organization
  • Big Pharma – the heads of some large Pharmaceutical companies and their minions

I’m not claiming they have conspired in criminal activity.  I just want to report on their decisions and actions and how these have impacted on the perception and use of HCQ in the treatment of COVID-19.  I’ll let you decide whether this rises to the level of criminality.

If there’s an Empire, there must also be a Rebel Alliance.

I’ll mention just a few of these now:

  • Donald Trump (US President) – Han Solo
  • Professor Didier Raoult – Chewbacca
  • Dr. Vladimir Zalenko – Chief Chirpa (Ewoks leader)

Back to the ice plant Hoth…

As soon as Trump made his bold, hope-laden prediction, the Empire embarked on a mission to destroy any chance HCQ had for humanity’s good.  I initially thought it was

simply because Trump promoted it.  I now believe that there may be other, more sinister reasons.  For the Empire had already been at work, building their Death Star (more later).

Professor Didier Raoult has been fighting epidemics on the front-line for decades and is very familiar with the safety profile and efficacy of CQ and HCQ in different medical contexts.  Raoult was familiar with the 2005 study on the efficacy of HCQ in the treatment of SARS-COV.  When news broke of SARS-COV2, he immediately prepared a treatment plan based on his broad use of the safe and effective anti-malarial.

Now, Fauci and Raoult have very different opinions regarding PCTs and this has played out in the media.  Raoult is very accomplished, very self-confident and opinionated on social media and has pilloried those who opposed his study.  The Empire immediately trained its guns onto him in an attempt to discredit his work.  He copped a barrage of libelous materials including a sciencemag.org article and a forbetterscience.com article which includes the quote: “Chloroquine is about to become a major embarrassment for everyone. And Raoult is the central figure in this international Il pleut de la merde.  I’ll let you do the translation.

In my previous article, I wrote about some of the early press that came out against President Trump and his HCQ tweet.  Jake Tapper (CNN Anchor) tweeted (Apr 22 2020) that “One can’t Sharpie an untested drug into safe status.” (Excuse me, Mr. Tapper, it was approved by the FDA as being safe in 1955).  Joy Behar (co-host of The View) said (Apr 23 2020) of Trump’s encouragement of the use of HCQ: “This is killing people.”  Clueless.

And I’m sure you also heard about the couple who drank aquarium cleaner.  The media blamed the death of Gary Lenius on Trump.   What they failed to report was that his wife had served him soda mixed with fish tank cleaner without his knowledge.  A friend of his said: “What bothers me about this is that Gary was a very intelligent man, a retired engineer who designed systems for John Deere in Waterloo, Iowa, and I really can’t see the scenario where Gary would say, ‘Yes, please, I would love to drink some of that Koi fish tank cleaner.’”  “It just doesn’t make any sense.”

The Fauci Effect

Dr. Fauci has never had anything positive to say about HCQ.  He described Raoult’s HCQ study results as “anecdotal; not done in a clinical trial.”  Dr. Fauci spoke publicly on the retracted Lancet study, agreeing that HCQ should not be used as a COVID-19 treatment unless it could be proven safe.  This article suggests that Fauci had an agenda in stopping HCQ use on behalf of Gilead. https://www.palmerfoundation.com.au/the-corruption-of-science-the-hydroxychloroquine-lancet-study-scandal-who-was-behind-it-anthony-faucis-intent-to-block-hcq-on-behalf-of-big-pharma/

It was only after Trump’s urging that the FDA allowed HCQ to be prescribed in the US for COVID-19 treatment (providing some additional legal protection for US doctors).  However, many US State Governors took the extraordinary step of banning HCQ for outpatient use.  That is, it could only be administered by doctors to people in a hospital – often in the later stages of COVID-19.

A retrospective study in Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals (April 23): https://www.the-hospitalist.org/hospitalist/article/221227/arrhythmias-ep/hydroxychloroquine-ineffective-covid-19-va-study-suggests suggested HCQ provided no benefit to the critically ill.  Raoult outlined several glaring instances of “scientific misconduct” within the study via the letter: https://www.palmerfoundation.com.au/response-to-magagnoli-medrxiv-2020-matthieu-million-yanis-roussel-didier-raoult/

On 22nd May, a very large study https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31180-6/fulltext was published in the prestigious Lancet journal.

CNN's Chris Cuomo Was Much Sicker With Coronavirus Than He ...

This study indicated that COVID-19 patients were more likely to die when given HCQ in a hospital setting versus standard care.  Upon reading the study (prior to its retraction), Dr Fauci “told CNN that ‘the data shows hydroxychloroquine is not an effective treatment’ …Referring to the Surgisphere report: ‘The scientific data is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy for it [HCQ],’ said Dr. Fauci.  Two weeks later, Lancet retracted the paper after it was found that the data had been falsified.

Too late.  As a result of this Lancet report, the WHO stopped a randomised, PCT study of HCQ already in progress and the US FDA issued a warning on HCQ use for COVID-19.

Before I continue with how the Empire attempted to strike back, I want to take a brief excursion and discuss the development of the new drug Remdesivir, by Gilead Sciences.  Here are some facts:

  • HCQ is a cheap drug (about $20 per course with Zinc and Zpac).
  • There are several newer experimental drugs being trialled to treat COVID-19.  Remdesivir by Gilead Sciences is one of these new drugs.  It can only be given in a hospital setting and costs between$3000 and $5000 per course.
  • The stock price of Gilead rose steadily through February and March as Remdesivir was being discussed as a possible treatment for COVID-19.
  • Even though President Trump spoke positively about HCQ and Remdesivir on March 19th, focus moved quickly toward the cheaper HCQ option and away from Remdesivir.  Gilead’s stock price began dropping.
  • On April 29th, Dr. Fauci spoke positively about the first stage of the Remdesivir trial – Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT), sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Dr. Fauci’s organisation).  He stated that the results – a 31% reduction in the time to recovery – were “highly significant”, presented “quite good news” and that Remdesivir would become “the standard of care” for US hospitalised COVID-19 patients.
The Fugitive (1993) directed by Andrew Davis • Reviews, film + ...
The one-armed man’s prosthesis – The Fugitive (1993)

However, the following data were not publicised:

  • The study’s primary endpoint was changed just weeks before its conclusion;
  • 60% of patients reported adverse events during follow-up.  Of these, 23% had serious adverse events including multiple-organ-dysfunction syndrome, septic shock, acute kidney injury, and hypotension.
  • Dr. Fauci said that the mortality rate “trended” towards being better.  But how does that square with his follow-up comment that Remdesivir’s impact on mortality rate “has not yet reached statistical significance.”
  • Results from a third study in China suggesting Remdesivir failed to help COVID-19 patients were released in the British medical journal, The Lancet, after review by a peer group of scientists.
  • Some have suggested that Fauci’s comments represent a conflicted double standard; he used his White House platform to praise his agency’s sponsored study (not published nor peer-reviewed), while slamming a peer-reviewed and published Chinese study.

Refer to https://www.healthnewsreview.org/2020/04/what-the-public-didnt-hear-about-the-nih-remdesivir-trial/ for more details.

  • The first phase of a PRTrial on the use of Remdesivir showed only mildly promising results, even against the adjusted outcomes.
  • Dr. Fauci reversed his strongly-held views on PCTs, stating that denying a patient Remdesivir would be unethical because it could have some benefit. Not OK for HCQ, but good enough for Remdesivir, Dr. Fauci?
  • Big Pharma companies are very large donors to Dr. Fauci’s NIAID, the CDC and other large, national Health groups.
  • Big Pharma are also all fighting for the prestige of creating the world’s first COVID-19 vaccine – and the REALLY big money that comes with that.

NOTE:  I had written all of the above several weeks ago and only yesterday came across this article https://www.medicineuncensored.com/twenty-one-billion-reasons by Dr. James Todaro.  All of my speculations were confirmed.  More about Dr. Todaro in the Section on Medical Cancel Culture.

Here is another great article that shows how the Empire had tried to kill off HCQ: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/08/04/an_effective_covid_treatment_the_media_continues_to_besmirch_143875.html

One could just imagine what a safe, cheap and effective COVID-19 treatment option would do for the world right now, in terms of saving lives and eliminating the COVID-19 plague.  But what would it do for Big Pharma stock prices?  The vaccines may not be required.

Rebel Alliance Heroes and Casualities

Many doctors are risking and have risked their reputations and livelihoods by advocating for the use of HCQ, as part of a combination of drugs including Zinc and Zpac, as a useful early-stage treatment for COVID-19.

Thankfully, there are many experienced doctors who are too big to be silenced.  Examples of them include:

  • Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, PhD (Yale School of Medicine)
  • Dr. Mark Siegel, MD (NYU Langone Health)
  • Dr. William Grace (Lennox Hill, Oncologist)
  • Dr Stephen Smith (The Smith Center for Infectious Diseases and Urban Health)
  • Dr. Drew Pinsky (TV and Radio celebrity doctor)
  • Dr. Mehmet Oz (TV celebrity doctor)
  • Dr. Oskoui (CEO of Foxhall Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Medicine)

All of these have extensive experience with the safe and effective use of HCQ for conditions other than COVID-19 and are advocating strongly for its use in prevention and early treatment of COVID-19.

Dr. Harvey Risch is perhaps the most credentialled of the above group.  He helped to promote the results of Dr. Vladimir Zalenko, who I wrote about earlier in this article.

A group of doctors, led by Simone Gold, held a summit in Washington DC (July 27-28 2020) to discuss their experiences with HCQ and other treatments for COVID-19.  This was live-streamed to about 20 Million people within a few hours and summarily de-platformed by Google, Youtube and Twitter.  What you may see now on the internet are some irrelevant, fringe views of one of the doctors as an attempt to discredit the entire group.  Their web-site www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com was removed by their ISP the next day.

However, the summit has been preserved at: https://americasfrontlinedoctorsummit.com/  prefaced by a press conference introducing the doctors and their purpose for meeting.  The summit videos are now available via Vimeo.  There are alternatives to Google, Youtube and Twitter.

I’d like to advocate for two of these videos at https://americasfrontlinedoctorsummit.com/sessions/ in particular:

The 3 pm Session on Hydroxychloroquine Science:

The doctors explain the five ways that HCQ stops and stalls the replication of SAR-COV2 virus in the cell, both by virtue of its alkalinity and its ability to

curtail the production of viral components; by providing a channel for the Zinc to enter through the membrane and disrupt the virus RNA in the cell and by altering the ACE2 receptors on the cell membrane so that SARS-COV2 cannot bind.   The session ends with Doctor Richard Urso explaining numerous studies extolling the benefits of HCQ to assist with many other medical conditions.  He ended by saying: “If I ever get stuck on a desert island, the drug I want is Hydroxychloroquine.”

Medical Cancel Culture

The 11:45 am Session on Medical Cancel Culture:

Various doctors discussed their experiences in being reprimanded, de-platformed and threatened with expulsion by their State Boards for holding views contrary to the establishment.

One of these was Dr. Mark Todaro.  I’ll quote from the following report https://americasfrontlinedoctorsummit.com/references/#white-paper  (page 13 ) to explain his story:

“The clearest example of physician free speech censorship is what happened to James Todaro, MD.  Dr. Todaro, who up until these events was a mere private citizen, tweeted his thoughts about HCQ including a link to a public Google doc six days before the President endorsed HCQ.  Dr. Todaro’s apolitical scientific commentary was his opinion of a scientific study that appeared to be fabricated, despite being published in a world-class journal.  It turns out Dr. Todaro was so spot-on correct, that the study, which unfortunately had enormous worldwide influence, was retracted which is exceedingly rare.  But before the public could read Dr. Todaro’s prescient words, the President happened to endorse HCQ, and Google scrubbed the document within hours.

And by scrubbed we mean that Google didn’t want you to think it was missing, they wanted you to not know such a thing ever even existed.  This is how is happens.

First, Dr. Todaro has already learned that he will be censored, so he decides to bypass the censor by not even attempting to get a mainstream news source to publish his story about HCQ. He has accepted that even though his story is exactly the kind of counter-culture story that used to be sought after by journalists, those days are gone.

So Dr. Todaro self-publishes a document that he wrote and puts it out for public view, on a site that calls itself content-neutral: Google. Google claims it is a platform and not a publisher, which is a huge distinction.  Platforms are just the vehicle to get the words from point a to point b.  Publishers are responsible for content.  If Google is a platform, which it represents itself to be, including before Congress, then it should not censor non-salacious content written by a scientist about science.

Censorship is evident for those who wish to see it.”

The group’s leader, Simone Gold is also the lead author on the group’s White Paper.  On Page 19 she wrote a section entitled:

Why Is HCQ Being Maligned?

“COVID-19 is an acronym for SARS-CoV-2. It is so named because it turns out there was a SARS-CoV-1.  Reading the scientific literature related to the first SARS is so eerily similar that excerpts are copy/pasted on the next page. In 2002 there was a new coronavirus, originating in China, which rapidly spread to dozens of countries, within a few months, leading to worldwide efforts to contain it.  The scientists discovered that CQ had a strong antiviral effect on this SARS-CoV virus, whether the CQ was used before or after infection.  It was concluded that CQ had both prophylactic and therapeutic use.

The study “Chloroquine is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread” by Vincent, Bergeron, Benjannet, et. al., was published by the official publication of the National Institutes of Health when Dr. Fauci was NIH Director.  Given that CQ was demonstrated to be very effective against a 78% identical coronavirus less than 15 years ago during a very similar situation, it is very curious that there was a multinational effort to restrict it starting in mid-January. (CQ is a precursor to the more modern HCQ. We now use HCQ in the USA.  But studies of CQ are as reliable as studies of HCQ.)

On January 13, 2020 France quietly changed the status of HCQ from its years long over the-counter status to “List II poisonous substance.”  This was an unprecedented demotion.  And in the USA: “Dr. Anthony Fauci said Wednesday that data shows HCQ is not an effective agent for the coronavirus, disputing use of the drug to fight the deadly virus even as President Donald Trump touts it as a potential cure.”

It is unclear when Dr. Fauci came to believe the opposite of what the NIH published when he was the NIH Director.  What we do know is that 70,000-100,000 excess American lives have been lost due to lack of access to HCQ.  So why did a medication that had been over the counter for decades, suddenly but quietly get pulled from the shelves, in the midst of a pandemic, due to a virus that is so similar it shares a name?

It is well known that newly patented drugs can be extremely profitable if there is demand and no other supply.  The demand for Gilead’s Remdisivir, which is used late in the disease, obviously will plummet if the disease is stopped by HCQ early. Remdisivir is sold for $3200-$5700 per treatment and the federal government has already purchased all or most of it.  The generic HCQ is ~$10 per treatment.”

Dr. Simone Gold was fired from her position only days later.  In a tweet on August 3, Dr. Gold wrote “After our press conference, I was defamed by the media, censored by social media companies, terminated from employment, and viciously attacked, all for advocating for the right of physicians to prescribe what they believe is best for their patients.”

I’ll leave you with one final question.  What did the heads of the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) know on January 13, 2020 that would cause them to quietly change the status of HCQ from the over-the-counter to “List II poisonous substance?” https://www.trustnodes.com/2020/03/30/france-banned-chloroquine-days-before-first-western-scientific-report-on-pandemic

So, do I think that HCQ will be the game-changer that Donald Trump hoped for?

I’m not sure.  “Difficult to see.

Correct grammar, Yoda's speech is? | The Sealy News

Always in motion is the future” says Master Yoda.

The Empire is very powerful and I think that the damage done to HCQ’s reputation is very great.  Many people fear for their lives and have forfeited much of their freedom.  Many doctors fear losing their livelihoods.  It also seems that the pathway for HCQ to undergo a PCT has been destroyed.

But has the Empire actually won?  Before I answer that question, I’d like to leave you with one final Star Wars image:

Closing Arguments

In civil trial cases, the standard of proof is based on the preponderance of evidence and not on “reasonable doubt.”  The complete set of case arguments should be tested, one by one, against available evidence, and then as a whole for coherence.  The winning case is the one that is correct most often and the one that hangs together the best.

Imagine a court, with a judge presiding over the human-caused Climate Change case, and with you as a member of the jury.  If you have been following the arguments presented by the natural climate change attorney, supported by a plethora of evidence:

  1. Who can you Trust?
  2. Handling the Truth
  3. Imprimatur
  4. Heat Island
  5. Mercury Rising?
  6. Get the Puck out of here!
  7. Fool’s Gold
  8. Simples!
  9. Did you check the fuse?
  10. Mistakes were made and
  11. Are we Green?

then you will have all that you need to deliver the verdict.

The attorney for natural climate change will now proceed with closing arguments.

Your honour, members of the jury, I will now summarise my arguments in favour of natural climate change and in opposition to human-caused climate change, based on atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.

Virtually all modern pro-AGW claims are based on Dr. Michael Mann’s “Hockey Stick Graph.”  Prior to 1998, palaeontologists and historians the world over used a well-regarded collection of temperature proxies, fossils, drawings and other historical records to argue for the existence of the Medieval Warm Period (WMP) and the Little Ice Age (LIA) in recent history.  Once the UN IPCC and Al Gore adopted the Hockey Stick graph as the cornerstone of their climate change argument, everything changed.  To say that the Hockey Stick caused a significant level of controversy within the scientific community would be a gross understatement.  Dr. Mann refused to release data for peer review on the basis of Intellectual Property rights.  Anyway, his actions, quite extraordinary in the context of scientific enquiry, led to accusations, which in turn led to law suits and counter-suits, even a contempt of court on the part of Dr. Mann, but still no Hockey Stick data.

Despite ongoing efforts to delay and obstruct, the facts were slowly unveiled via a series of leaked emails and documents (referred to as Climategate) and some relentless investigation and analysis on the part of two Canadians – statistician, Steve McIntyre and Professor Ross McKitrick.

There is strong evidence to suggest that in creating his Hockey Stick graph, Dr. Mann commenced with an a priori commitment to the belief that rising CO2 emissions are the primary cause of global warming.  All of his efforts then went into finding data that ONLY supported this belief.  How could such a suggestion be made, reasonably?  Well, to begin with, Dr. Mann deliberately excluded ANY paleo climate proxy data that supported the MWP and LIA positions and ONLY selected data that indicated a steady decline in temperature until the beginning of the industrial era and then a rise after that.  Climategate emails prove this point.  He decided to splice the instrumental temperature record onto proxy data in the mid-late 1900’s when the latter no longer served his purpose and included this graph in a Nature magazine article.  Climategate emails prove this point.  When replying about this “splicing” practice on a forum post, he denounced it, vehemently.  Obviously, he didn’t bank on the release of personal email to uncover his hypocrisy.

Hockey Stick graph showing deleted proxy data that did not suit

In a similar vein, Phil Jones, the Director of the Climate Research Unit, admitted a like deception when describing a graph for the 2007 UN IPCC report.  His selective use of the (now departed) CRU deputy Director Keith Briffa’s tree-ring data and

Mike’s Nature trick,”

enabled this deception, designed to

“hide the [temperature] decline.”

In an email to Michael Mann, Keith Briffa

agonized over the best course of action… the Mann et reconstruction (and others) DO INDEED show evidence of Medieval warmth.”

Briffa’s lead authorship of a 2007 UN IPCC report chapter was his last high-profile scientific article.  Once McIntyre broke through the Freedom of Information (FOI) appeals process, Briffa’s hand was finally forced to release proxy data.  It would appear that the embarrassment concerning the revealed deception caused Briffa to retreat into the shadows.

So, what do we make of Mann’s straight-jacketed hockey stick shaft?  Accepted paleo climate evidence, coupled with the obviously biased data splicing deceptive practices renders Mann’s shaft a cheap, Chinese knock-off.

Let’s move on.  What of the pro-AGW claim that the 20th century temperature rise is “unprecedented” and due to industrial era rises in atmospheric CO2 levels alone?  The relationship between temperature and CO2 since 1920 (the Hockey-stick blade) should be much easier to measure and prove than its paleo cousin.  Surely!  This relationship on its own – or not – should be sufficient to settle this case.  I will now recap the evidence presented, commencing with an assessment of the modern temperature record.

The Global Historical Climatological Network (GHCN) is the world’s source for global temperature data.  The GHCN is comprised of three main global temperature histories: the combined CRU-Hadley record (HadCRUT), the NASA-GISS (GISTEMP) record, and the NOAA record.  We are grateful for the efforts of Canadian Professor of Economics, Ross McKitrick for his significant research and peer-reviewed articles on the integrity of the temperature data managed by the GHCN.

Thermal Image of Las Vegas, NV at night

The investigative work of McKitrick et al identified a number of serious issues with the GHCN temperature data including:

  • a dismissal of the true effect of the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect (applying a paltry 0.1 degrees C per Century adjustment);
  • the disappearance of half of the USHCN weather stations around 1990 with a move away from higher altitudes and latitudes, away from the coast and towards airport locations (all with significant UHI biases);
  • over 70 % of US weather stations are very low quality with measurement errors greater than 2 degrees C;
  • the Sea Surface Temperature (SST)

    The 0.5 degrees C blip in SST measurement

    measurement record is replete with errors including the absorption of a 0.5 degrees C “blip” when US and UK vessel numbers changed abruptly in 1945

“…which could fundamentally change the picture of mid-century warming;”

  • a homogenisation algorithm which contaminates clean with dirty temperature data; and
  • adjustments to historical temperature records cooling pre-1980 data by 0.2 degrees C and warming post-1980 data by 0.1 degree C.

The size of adjustment factors and when they apply

The homogenised data set has created a steeper and straighter Hockey-Stick blade, adding 0.3 degrees C to the data over time.  The data appears to have been infused deliberately with factors that cool the past, warm the present and minimise the mid-century cooling period.  Can this appearance be shown as resulting from deceptive actions or simply “dumb luck?”  Let me argue for the former.

In addition to the six data issues mentioned above are the following facts:

  • The owner of the GHCN is Phil Jones; the same Phil Jones who used “Mike’s Nature trick to hide the decline.”
  • Phil Jones confided (in a July 8 2004 email) that he and co-author Kevin Trenberth were determined to keep McKitrick’s evidence out of the IPCC report.

“I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report.  Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer review literature is” wrote Jones.

  • In 2004, Jones admitted to an interviewer that

“even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 or so years invested in the work.  Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?”

  • In 2009, a Freedom of Information request was submitted to the CRU to release the raw weather station data and its processing methods for inspection. Phil Jones refused to release the data claiming that it was lost / destroyed.  Yes, the fundamental data upon which all Global Warming policy is based, has been lost or destroyed by the official owner.
  • It must be noted that the period 1951-1980 has been selected as the reference period for all modern temperature reporting trends. The implications of issue f) above are that:
    • modern temperature anomaly figures all have a 0.2 degrees C bias baked into the reference period (they are 0.2 degrees larger than otherwise) and
    • modern temperature anomaly figures all have a 0.1 degree C bias baked into their current figure (they are 0.1 degrees larger than otherwise).
  • In summary, modern temperature anomaly figures are 0.3 degrees C larger than the raw data may indicate.
  • However, with the raw base data lost / destroyed, the current temperature record cannot be reconstructed and none of Professor Ross McKitrick’s issues can be confirmed.
  • The Connolly-Soon paper on the role of solar variability on Northern hemisphere temperatures (2015) found that

“as much as 86% of the warming trend in the ‘all [China] stations’ estimate for the 1951-1990 period may be urbanization bias.”

  • Chine Researchers Huang and Lu made a similar finding (2015) concluding that

“the average warming rates of huge cities and megalopolises are significantly higher than those of medium-sized cities and small cities, indicating that the UHI has a significant effect on climate warming.”

  • The first ever audit of the IPCC’s go to temperature data set (HadCRUT4) was conducted in 2017 by John McLean Phd. The dataset was has found be so riddled with [over 70] errors and “freakishly improbable data” that it is effectively useless.

A final point to note here is that current Climate Reference Network (CRN) data is only provided as a relative “anomaly” figure, thereby baking in the adjustments made to other data sets.  An absolute temperature figure from the CRN is simply not available.

No “official” temperature data set can be trusted to measure the anomaly in temperature from any past reference period.  The CRN temperature data is useful in that it is highly accurate and can be compared over time.  It has been in place since 2005 and can begin to show a temperature trend with some confidence level.  However, it cannot be trusted to measure temperature anomaly from the reference period (1951 – 1980), unless 0.3 degrees C is removed from this figure.

To put some icing on this cake, I invite you to examine the Youtube video entitled: “Statistical Analysis strongly shows that Carbon Dioxide cannot be the Cause of Global Warming.”  The authors used the IPCC’s preferred data set (HadCRUT) and the IPCC’s own criteria to demonstrate that CO2 is “UNLIKELY” to be the major contributor to Global Warming.

If CO2 cannot be the major or even a significant driver of warming, let’s examine the evidence for other factors that might be driving climate change.

In a previous hearing, evidence was submitted regarding the collaboration between the Irish father and son duo, Ronan and Michael Connelly and the astrophysicist, Willie Soon.  By isolating high quality rural weather stations (with the UHI effect and homogenisation bias removed), a remarkably good correlation exists between temperature data and the Hoyt and Schatten solar estimate – rejected by the IPCC once the Hockey Stick appeared.  They wrote:

“Therefore, if the Hoyt & Schatten reconstruction is a reasonably accurate estimate of solar activity trends (see Section 2.2), and our mostly-rural temperature trend estimates are reasonably accurate (as seems to be the case from Section 4), then this suggests that Northern Hemisphere surface air temperature trends have been heavily influenced by changes in Total Solar Irradiance since at least 1881.”

I should note that the IPCC’s Climate Models (CMIP5 and beyond) all assume that the sun has no significant effect on warming the earth’s temperature.

But let’s not rely on this Connolly-Soon study alone.  In 2013, the Irish scientists analysed millions of weather balloon data sets to demonstrate that the earth’s atmosphere behaves as an ideal gas.  What does that mean?  In an ideal gas, there are no hot or cold pockets of air; it is all well-mixed.  The Connolly’s analysis of weather balloon data exhibited a Coefficient of Correlation of 0.997 with their thermodynamic equations.

Let’s stop for a moment and let that sink in.  The computer asked the data “can you show me a hot or cold pocket of air compared to what I’m expecting to see” and the data said “NO” – billions of times.  Only very, very rarely did the data said “hold on – perhaps.”   The computer is exhausted and the DATA now demands that the Radiative Greenhouse effect CANNOT be operating from the ground level up through half of the Stratosphere (when the weather balloon bursts), accounting for 80-90 % of the earth’s atmosphere.  The surface temperature MUST be modulated by something OTHER THAN the so-called CO2 “warming blanket.”  The Connolly’s have proposed an alternative mechanism for heat energy transfer through the atmosphere.

Nikolov and Zeller – surface temperatures of hard celestial bodies are based on solar irradiance and atmospheric pressure, regardless of gas composition

Let’s not forget about the work of Ned Nikolov and Karl Zeller, who studied NASA data to show that the composition of atmosphere surrounding a hard, celestial body has NO influence on surface temperature.  Instead, they showed that temperature relies on solar irradiance and atmospheric pressure (again, with a Coefficient of Correlation over 0.99).  Their findings support that of the Connolly’s and Willie Soon, despite the fact that all scientists came to the same conclusion, using vastly different data sources.  Nikolov and Zeller have obviously upset the scientific apple-cart, with many scientific journals refusing to publish their reports.

Allow me to pause for a moment while I summarise some key facts:

  • The official global temperature data is compromised, biasing the current temperature anomaly by 0.3 degrees C;
  • The owners have acted in bad faith, manipulating and even destroying or losing raw historical data in an attempt to hide their actions;
  • Even the biased data does not support the CO2 warming theory, according to the IPCC’s own criteria;
  • Different studies using multiple sources of data from varied perspectives refute the Radiative Greenhouse effect.  There is no relationship between CO2 and temperature;
  • Although the climate system is very complex, the empirical evidence does support a relationship between solar irradiance and surface temperature;
  • Alarmist claims for polar bear extinction, coral destruction and sea level rises are unsupported by data. Polar bears thrive, coral regenerates and Obama bought a mansion on the beach; and
  • CO2 is not pollution. Instead, increased atmospheric CO2 levels have helped to green the earth, resulting in record crop yields.

We are now heading into a pivotal time for this debate and it has everything to do with the sun.  It is just earth’s light-bulb or does it have a real bearing on the climate?

About five to ten years ago, a debate reignited regarding the impacts of a predicted Grand Solar Minimum – a solar cycle in which the sun retreats into relative hibernation.

AGW protagonists, notably NASA, argued that warming due to CO2 levels would be far greater than any reduction in solar activity.  In 2010, many AGW proponents were giddy at the prospects that this year could be the hottest on record.  The New York Times reported on a NASA study that

“conclude[d] that there has been no reduction in the global warming trend of 0.15-0.20 deg C per decade that began in the late 1970s.”

On the pro-AGW skepticalscience.com website, a 2012 article on the current state of global warming examined the effect of changing solar cycles and dismissed solar irradiance as trivial within the context of global warming.  They wrote:

“Reviewing the evidence, the authors concluded that rapid global warming is likely in the next few years.”

They go on to state that

“with a warming climate … warm extreme temperatures become more common place, and cold extremes less common.”

More predictions about coming winters include

“…the past two unusually cool winters in the United States and Europe do not alter the expectation that middle latitude winters will tend to become warmer as global warming continues.”

They finish with:

We conclude that the slowdown of warming is likely to prove illusory, with more rapid warming appearing over the next few years.”

Note: emphasis has been added to some of the above quotes to contrast them with recent climatic reality to be discussed later.

NASA temperature graph is based on data with known bias and errors. The SATIRE-T2 solar estimates are selected by NASA to support their narrative. They differ from the estimates used by Soon (Hoyt & Schatten).

NASA produces graphs like the one below indicating that reducing solar activity does not influence the steadily rising temperatures.

In 2019, Astrophysicist Valentina Zharkova published a paper in Nature magazine confirming a Grand Solar Minimum (GSM) from 2020 to 2055 where all four magnetic fields of the sun go out of phase.  It was later retracted following a loud outcry from the pro-AGW scientific community.  The detractors challenged Zharkova’s base assumptions regarding the earth-Sun orbital distance during this time period.  Oh, and they also didn’t like the bit about solar activity being a major contributor to climate change.  So Nature retracted her paper.  I guess that’s one way to gain a consensus – silence anyone with an opposing view!

The relative stability of the earth’s average surface temperature over the past 15 years has either been “debunked” or gone virtually undetected in the media.  In fact, you’ll only read about the “myth” of the warming pause or slow-down, if you continue to page 2 on your google search.

Articles such as:

  • Global warming ‘hiatus’ is the climate change myth that refuses to die (The Conversation, 2018)
  • The ‘imminent mini ice age’ myth is back, and it’s still wrong (The Guardian, 2018)
  • The Global Warming Hiatus: Making A Mountain Out of a Mole Hill (Forbes, 2019)

are but a small sample of what you’ll see on the net.

In response to questions from climate naturalists about the apparent slow-down, pro-AGW science says:

  • We are still warming (although we are not)
  • It’s the El Nino/La Nina phenomenon (but these are normal weather events)
  • It’s the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (yes, climate is complex; more than just CO2 effects)
  • There’s a greater transfer of heat to the ocean (really? But why?)
  • It’s lower sunspot activity (but I thought you discounted the effects of the sun?)
  • It’s volcanic eruptions and warming occurring in the upper troposphere rather than at the surface (now you’re clutching at straws!).

I guess, when you control the data, the scientific journals and the media, you control the narrative.

But wait.  Don’t we have some good quality data?  What does that have to tell us?

As you will recall from a previous argument, the Climate Reference Network (CRN) was established in 2005 to provide a high-quality network of weather stations, all in rural locations and designed to eliminate known forms of measurement bias.  The CRN data (2005 – present) is the only temperature data that can be trusted.

Although it covers only the USA, the CRN is a useful proxy for global temperature.  The graph of monthly average temperatures from 2005 through May 2020 shows that there has been no discernible rise in temperature, despite CO2 levels rising over 8 % during this time.

Meteorologists identified El Niño conditions in 2005, 2012 and 2016, causing spikes in warming.  Once normal Pacific Ocean temperatures were restored, surface temperatures returned to their reduced temperature levels.

It’s a good thing that AGW proponents admit that weather effects such as El Nino are simply that – weather – and not climate effects.  Even Kevin Trenberth (a colleague of Phil Jones) stated that “we have seen rapid warming recently, but it is an example of natural variation that is associated with changes in the Pacific rather than climate change.”

The CRN data from 2005 through May of 2020 was examined and smoothed (using an Excel Exponential filter) to reduce some of the noise.  The temperature anomaly has not budged from the 2005 anomaly level of 0.44 degrees C, of which 0.1 degrees C was introduced by “temperature adjustment.”  NASA’s conclusions are simply in error.

Thanks to Phil Jones, no-one is able to access the world’s raw temperature data to construct an unbiased temperature data set.  So, all my analyst was able to do was to graft the CRN 2005 – 2020 data to the Connolly-Soon data to create a “clean” Northern-Hemisphere – US data set that covers the period from 1920 through 2020.  The Keeling Curve (atmospheric CO2 levels) was then overlaid in the best-possible way to try to fit it with the accurate temperature data.  So, what does 100 years of unbiased surface temperature data tell us about its relationships with CO2 and Solar Irradiance?  As you will note, my analyst was unable to source a more up to date TSI estimate used by Soon. so it stops near 2005.  However, we know that it will be reducing in line with the Grand Solar Minimum.

It is true, that 15 years is a short time on which to base long-term predictions about the impact of the sun on temperature.  However, 100 years is sufficient to demonstrate that CO2 is NOT the main driver.  It is only close from 1970 through 2005.  Otherwise, forget about it!  Hence you see why attempts were made to flatten the 1940 – 1970 cooling period with adjustments and blips, warm the post 1980’s and explain away the recent warming hiatus.  When all you have is a CO2, everything looks like a nail!

You may not have heard much on the media regarding record cold temperatures across many parts of the world recently, unless, of course, you’ve seen the Outsiders Weather & Ice-Age Watch.   The media is hoping that you don’t notice as you shiver in your ugg boots.  With some luck it will get hot again and they will not have to invent any more tall tales.  One of their go-to stories – Greenland’s ice sheets – is now a problem.  They have been melting gradually for over 100 years as the world emerged from the Little Ice Age.  AGW proponents have argued that the melting is due to CO2.  Climate Naturalists believe that it’s far more complex than that – a mix of solar activity, cloud cover, winds, ocean currents etc.  However, despite today’s record levels of CO2, the earth is not warming appreciably and I’ll be; Greenland’s ice sheets have reversed course!  They began growing and have continued their growth trend of the past few years.  Never before has the mass balance of ice and snow grown by 4 Giga Tonnes in a single day in June.  Hey NASA, what about your bold predictions that “the slowdown of warming is likely to prove illusory, with more rapid warming appearing over the next few years” and “cold extremes less common?”   The Greenland Ice sheet Surface Mas Balance may replace the polar bear as the Climate Change canary in the coal mine!

Your honour, members of the jury, I’ll now complete this closing argument with a few indisputable facts:

  • Paleo climate records were manipulated to rewrite climate history;
  • The official instrumental temperature record has been manipulated and data has been lost or destroyed by the owner to obscure the wrongdoing;
  • The reported temperature rise has more to do with the Urban Heat Island effect and measurement errors than with CO2;
  • This was all done in an attempt to support a fictitious, “unprecedented rise in temperature” narrative designed to manufacture a climate crisis;
  • CO2 does not correlate with temperature across the last 100 years;
  • The RGHE mechanism is supposedly simple and CO2 is touted as the primary driver of warming; yet
  • Complex and convoluted reasons are used to explain why CO2 could not warm the earth over the past 15 years.

Occam’s razor demands that we dismiss the man-made climate change argument.  It does not correspond to evidence in the particular and it certainly doesn’t produce a coherent argument.  A broken clock is correct twice per day.  Man-made Climate Change does not rise to the level of a broken clock.

Members of the jury, on the preponderance of evidence, I contend that the sun and other natural causes are a far more plausible reasons for climate change than man-made CO2.  I rest my case.