Over the past few years, TARPs or Trigger Action Response Plans have spread from Mining to adjacent industries. TARPs are plans, deliberately developed and put into place to mitigate risks anticipated from a specific set of conditions being met. One such plan being used by some of my clients is a “Weather TARP.” Its purpose is to protect large machines from damage by securing them in place before severe winds are encountered.
Some of the worst incidents among my client network over the past decade were caused by micro-bursts – very sudden and severe storms that blew machines uncontrollably along their rails. Many of these storms appeared without warning and were gone within minutes. Here is some rare slow-motion footage of a wet micro-burst or a “rain bomb.”
The T (Trigger) condition is perhaps the most important part of any TARP. If set too low, there will be too many false alarms; if too high, it will be too late. Imagine what would happen if the Weather TARP Trigger was set to an instantaneous wind speed of > 70 kph AND a sustained wind speed of > 60 kph for a minimum of 10 minutes. This “AND” condition may have been appropriate for a traditional cyclone that builds slowly, but not for a micro-burst.
Have you ever asked yourself why CEOs insist their people jump through hoops to respond to serious incidents, especially those related to safety? In most cases, I believe it’s because they genuinely care. Then there are the sociopaths who simply respond to the consequences of legal action. I remember a mock trial we organised back in the GMN days. It was run by a couple of lawyers who grilled my friend Bushy about a fictitious incident he pretended to be accountable for. Boy, did he squirm under their precise legal questioning! Imagine what would happen if the regulator or commissioner was in the pocket of the mining industry.
If you’ve been reading my previous articles, you will have seen the evidence presented to show that the COVID shots are neither safe nor effective. But here’s something new that I’ve not written about before.
The largest and most prestigious sovereign health administrator in the world is the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the CDC.
One would assume that by now they would have learnt a thing or two about crafting an effective Trigger formula.
In August 2021 Steve Kirsch (a double-vaxxed big tech entrepreneur) told the CDC that the formula they use to trigger safety signals was seriously flawed. They ignored him. In this article, he describes the problem with the CDC’s COVID vax Trigger definition.
“The PRR value for the COVID vaccines will rarely exceed 1 because there are so many adverse events from the COVID vaccine because it is so dangerous (i.e., B in the formula is a huge number) so the numerator is always near zero. Hence, the “safety signal” is rarely triggered because the vaccine is so dangerous.”
Hang on a minute, Steve. Did the CDC and FDA actually know that the COVID vax would cause a myriad of adverse events? Perhaps they thought it would behave like the more traditional vaccines?
Well, I’m glad you asked that question.
In February of 2022, Pfizer and the FDA had failed in court to block the release of thousands of documents that were requested under the Freedom of Information (FOIA) Act. One telling report Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports contains over 1,000 adverse events that were known EARLY in the vaxx roll-out.
With the PRR B value being ~ 1,000, it would be very difficult to Trigger a safety signal for the COVID vaxx shots.
This Trigger design is either the most tragic of mistakes or the most brilliant of deceptions. Plausible deniability? We’ll find out.
Perhaps you should read my article The Prestige for more on the art of illusion and deception.
So, we see lightning flashing in the distance. The birds have stopped chirping. A storm is approaching but the Trigger is broken.
What else can be used to Trigger an appropriate Action Response Plan?
Collect and submit other relevant data? Will the CEO consider it?
Observe the baby on the breast
Dr. John Campbell discusses the reports of vaccine mRNA found in human breast milk. How on earth did it get from the arm to the breast?
Survey the sporting field
The background rate of death (prior to 2020) averaged around 6 per month.
Hundreds Of Professional Athletes Collapsing On Field, Dying From Mysterious Heart Complications
Saudi Ambassador dies mid speech in Cairo at the Arab-African Conference
Well, that’s not something you see every day.
Look up in the sky
Christine Anderson, German Member of the European Parliament, explains what is happening with the aviation industry at this time.
This vaccine campaign— it will go down as the biggest scandal in medical history, and moreover, it will be known as the biggest crime ever committed.”Christine Anderson
Investigate recent medical studies
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo recommends Against mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines for Males Aged 18–39 because Florida study shows mRNA COVID vaccines do more harm than good.
He was immediately censored by Twitter. Watch him on Tucker.
Bottom Line: Males in Florida aged 18-39 are 84% more likely to die from heart attacks (within 28 days of an mRNA COVID-shot.)
Why is this only happening in Florida? Watch the video to find the answer!
Are the kids OK?
The Florida study is about 18-39 year-old men. Surely, this isn’t happening to children!
Please watch this 3 min video by Steve Kirsch’s Vaccine Safety Research Foundation to see just how much Big Pharma
loves your kids.
“Off the Charts” Rise in Miscarriages and Fetal Abnormalities Since the Vaccine Was Introduced
“What I’ve Seen In The Past Two Years Is Unprecedented”: Renowned OB/GYN tells Dr. Drew That He Has Seen an “Off the Charts” Rise in Miscarriages and Fetal Abnormalities Since the Vaccine Was Introduced.
CDC Admits Post-Vaccine Myocarditis Concerns That Were Labeled Covid Misinformation Are Legit
Couldn’t hide it any longer, hey?
Ok, they were studies. Is there any physical proof?
Inspect the morgues
Embalmers find long, rubbery clots inside corpses since COVID vaccines began.
Feel the loss of the grieving parents
Analyse the All-Cause Mortality data
I’ve written about this topic in previous articles: Hide and Seek and Trust focusing on All-Cause Mortality data from the UK and the USA (Insurance Claim data). Here’s an update from a few new sources.
Before we go Around the Grounds, there appears to be at least two mechanisms of action:
- Sudden death within days of being injected (heart attacks, strokes etc.); and
- Slower death around five months later, potentially caused by slowly-forming blood clots or aggressive cancers etc.
I hope we don’t find out later that there are any other longer-term mechanisms.
Steve Kirsch: Vaccines are taking an average of 5 months to kill people
I’d suggest you take some time in this article. You’ll be surprised by what the tattoo artists are finding with the skin and blood of the vaccinated.
“The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file. I got it from a whistleblower. This shows deaths are taking 5 months from the jab to happen. This is why it’s hard to see.”
Study the Netherlands
Dr. Robert Malone: Data doesn’t lie: mRNA-vaccines and correlation to all-cause mortality
This graph shows a very strong correlation between 4th vaccination rate and death among the Dutch 60 + years of age.
It comes from analysis conducted by Dr. Theo Schetters from the Netherlands.
A video explaining this data can be viewed here.
Dr. Schetters received a PhD in Medicine, invented an improved vaccine formulation against diseases associated with Rhipicephalus ticks, received the Medal of Honour of the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montpellier 1 in France and was bestowed Professeur Invité as recognition for his contribution to longstanding collaborative research with the Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology.
Monitoring Germany with Dr. Paul Alexander
Excess mortality in Germany 2020-2022 (Kuhbandner & Reitzner): found in 2020, the observed number of deaths was close to expected, but in 2021 (April on), observed number of deaths was 2 standard deviations above expected number (age groups between 15 to 79); similar mortality pattern was observed for stillbirths; Something must have happened in April 2021; YES, vaccines in Germany!
Finally, a look Down Under:
Better late than never. The Australian Bureau of Statistics got off their back-sides and decided to report mortality data. It’s actually quite granular and shows a whopping 17% increase in Excess Deaths in 2022.
The Aussie data does seem to be eerily similar to that of other nations; sudden rises contemporaneously with mass booster campaigns and then a further rise several months later.
If there is any good news from these data, only 68% of the Aussie population was fully boosted at end August (versus 98% one shot). 30% have said “no more for me.”
Whoa! Hold on a minute, John. If this were true, why wouldn’t doctors be speaking out about it?
Finally, hearing from doctors
Everyone should read this. We are headed for a perfect storm with escalating health needs and a shortage of doctors because of how we treat them.
Dr. Paul Marik on why doctors aren’t speaking out
Dr. Paul Marik is perhaps the second most experienced ICU doctor in the world. He was double jabbed when patients started coming to him with vaccine injuries. Then he began to do the research that red-pilled him. He saved many lives by treating critically ill COVID patients with the protocols he helped developed as co-founder of the FLCCC Alliance.
Kirsch writes: “My blue pilled friends can’t figure out why, if the vaccines are so dangerous, aren’t more doctors speaking out. Here’s why.”
I don’t know these guys. Show me one prominent TV doctor who is willing to speak out. Then I might listen.
Well, here is Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a prominent British cardiologist who has promoted the COVID shots on British TV. He is an award-winning Consultant Cardiologist and an internationally renowned expert in the prevention, diagnosis and management of heart disease.
He was quite happy to go along with the establishment narrative until something unthinkable happened; shaking him to the core. Instead of simply trusting what was being spoon-fed to him by the medical establishment and their running dogs, the legacy media, he decided to analyse the data himself and published a peer-reviewed paper.
In a two-part paper entitled “Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine,” real-world data reveals that in the non-elderly population the number needed to vaccinate to prevent one death from Covid-19 runs into thousands and that re-analysis of randomized controlled trial data suggests a greater risk of suffering a serious adverse event from the vaccine than to be hospitalized with Covid-19.
“We must use this as an opportunity to transform the system to produce better doctors, better decision making, healthier patients and restore trust in medicine and public health. Until all the raw data on the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines have been independently analysed, any claims purporting that they confer a net benefit to humankind cannot be considered to be evidence based,” Dr. Malhotra concludes.
His father passed away from massive blood clots six months after his booster. He was fit and had no underlying health conditions.
How is a TARP supposed to work?
What if the CEO genuinely considered all of the available data and then still insisted on mandating the shot? You’d need to wonder whether they really cared, were paid off or were simply sociopathic.
Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics
Steve Kirsch: Exclusive: Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up.
Israel didn’t start to gather safety data until a year into the vaccine program. They gathered 6 months’ worth of data and found that the vaccines weren’t safe so they lied to the world about it. Thank God for whistle-blowers leaking Zoom calls.
The CDC used to claim that “The mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body.“
That claim has been quietly removed from their web-site.
ICAN Wins Lawsuit Forcing CDC to Turn Over V-SAFE Covid Vaccine Injury Data
Shows 7.7% Seek Medical Care After Vaccination and 25% Have Serious Side Effects.
As Dr. Malhotra found out the hard way, it seems that the medical establishment is rotten to the core. But why would they be so hell-bent on pushing ahead with these unsafe and ineffective mRNA shots?
Is this simply about money or are there more sinister forces at play?
If you’d like to watch an excellent longer-form documentary and get a second opinion about whether the COVID shots are Safe and Effective, please watch this video.
The NEW COVID Booster is GO!
In case you haven’t realised it, a new bi-valent (Wuhan strain + Omicron BA4/BA5) COVID shot has been launched. Guess how many humans were tested before the release? ZERO. But they did test mice. In the Moderna mouse trial, all 10 boosted mice got COVID when challenged. But no big deal, right? Mice are not people.
In the 8-mouse Pfizer trial, one mouse produced 22,000 units of antibodies in response to their shot, while another mouse produced 300. That is a 7,333% difference.
One can only imagine what would happen in humans where one person generated 7,333% more spike protein antibodies than another. It seems like that’s of little concern to the regulator.
Why has this all happened?
Only God know the secret motivation of people. However, when we see their past actions and when they tell us of their future plans, we should believe them.
Dr. Robert Malone: FDA is using the COVID-19 Vaccines as a “Platform Technology” for mRNA Vaccine Trials.
In this article, Malone provides an insight into why there have been unprecedented levels of mismanagement and malfeasance perpetrated by Big Pharma, the FDA and NIH on the world’s population.
“The World Health Organization (WHO) and US government officials laid out strategies for the process of future mRNA vaccine approvals by the FDA in a Sept, 2022 online publication ahead of Dec, 2022 print.
We no longer have to speculate about what the FDA has decided about considering future mRNA vaccines and using the past pre-clinical data package as the foundation for these vaccines as being a “platform” technology.
CBER decided that going forward, with new mRNA vaccine trials, ONLY the product (the final formulation) should be tested as long as same manufacturing process and LNP are used. This is despite the fact that CBER did not do complete biodistribution or toxicity studies on these products, as discovered in the FOIA Japanese pre-clinical package and the US court ordered document release.
Essentially, CBER has completely bypassed the issues of these vaccines not having a complete pre-clinical evaluation, and in April 2021 decided that new mRNA vaccines in development will not have to comply with the norms for vaccine development. That is all mRNA vaccines in the future, as long as don’t vary from what has already been done, will be like processed like the influenza model, with only the “payload” to be tested.
Finally, CBER has determined that bio-distribution studies on new mRNA vaccines using this “platform technology” will not have to be redone, even though they were not properly evaluated in the first place. This is over the top idiocy. … The bio-distribution studies were done using … essentially a parlor trick, and is absolutely not quantitative. Good for pictures on the cover of Rolling Stone, but not for actual bio-distribution analysis. This was the specific problem which I called Dr. Peter Marks about last fall, and which he assured me had been addressed in the full data package submitted by Pfizer. Just for the record, he lied to me.
What this all means is that using these flawed pre-clinical trials to support a platform technology was PLANNED from the beginning.
By not focussing on the payload of the vaccines, but instead relying on the generic formulations prior to initiating clinical trials, this has allowed CBER (and Moderna, and Pfizer/BioNTech) to transfer these highly flawed pre-clinical data packages to all upcoming mRNA vaccine trials for new vaccine products!
The implications of this are enormous. First, it is complete regulatory failure as well as yet more evidence of regulatory capture. Second, that this “pandemic” has been exploited to drive approval of a mRNA platform technology – whereby only TWO companies will be allowed to compete (those that completed the two approved pre-clinical packages).
We know now that the pseudouridine-containing mRNA does not break down for months. But rather, it stays in the body producing protein. This is not natural mRNA by any stretch of the imagination…The protein levels being produced by these vaccines is not known, the duration of protein production isn’t known, and the biodistribution of protein production is not known. And the FDA and other global regulatory authorities are all comfortable with this?? … we know from many prior immune tolerance studies that too much antigen (protein in this case), can cause “tolerance.” That is essentially where the immune system stops seeing the threat. … We know from multiple peer reviewed papers from top global laboratories that they are driving “immune imprinting” or “original antigenic sin” problems– in human beings (not just mice). This is not theoretical. It is real, and being exacerbated by the “booster vaccines.”
In the future … it will be almost impossible to now move away from this manufacturing process and LNP. This will become the platform technology because of the shortsighted position taken by the FDA/CBER.
Another issue is that this synthetic mRNA (pseudouridine was substituted for uridine) is that it is immunosuppressive. Having this mRNA in the body suppresses not only the ability to fight off latent DNA viruses such as shingles, EBV and CMV, it is likely to also suppress the ability of the immune system to detect cancer.
In the future, CBER will have to come to terms with the fact that the pre-clinical trials were completely inadequate, and yet they now have 50+ mRNA vaccine trials currently enrolling and over 150 more on the way based on that highly flawed pre-clinical data package. A quick search at clinicaltrials.gov yields documents the problem that they have created.
Currently a search on mRNA vaccine yields many, many results of clinical trials that have evidently used the incomplete data package from the COVID-19 vaccines as “platform technology.” At least 50 of these mRNA vaccine clinical trials are currently enrolling.
This is how the new booster is being presented to the public. I’m confused about the “heart” image. Is the booster supposed to be good for our hearts or is it telling us that the booster loves us?
I’ll finish this article on the topic of love.
Love is the fruit, but Truth is the root.
Tell me, who really loves you?